Andhra Pradesh moves SC seeking ‘fair‘ division of assets, liabilities with Telangana
The Hindu
The Supreme Court Bench has sought response from Telangana and Union Government.
The Supreme Court on Monday sought a response from the Centre on a petition filed by the Andhra Pradesh government seeking a “fair, equitable and expeditious division of assets and liabilities" with Telangana.
A Bench led by Sanjiv Khanna also issued notice to Telangana.
First linguistic State gets split
The Andhra Pradesh government has argued in its petition that the assets include 245 institutions and corporations specified under the Ninth and Tenth Schedules of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014.
“The total value of the fixed assets of the 245 institutions to be divided is about ₹1,42,601 crores. Non-division of the assets is clearly to the benefit of Telangana since about 91% of these assets are situated in Hyderabad [the capital of the erstwhile combined State] which is now in Telangana,” Andhra Pradesh government, represented by senior advocate K.V. Vishwanathan and Mahfooz A. Nazki, has submitted.
The State said despite the bifurcation on June 2, 2014, the actual division of assets and liabilities had not even commenced till date [despite repeated efforts by the Government of Andhra Pradesh seeking a speedy resolution].
“Despite a lapse of more than eight years, Andhra Bhawan situated in Delhi has not been formally bifurcated,” the petition has said.
Pakistan coach Gary Kirsten stated that “not so great decision making” contributed to his side’s defeat to India in the Group-A T20 World Cup clash here on Sunday. The batting unit came apart in the chase, after being well placed at 72 for two. With 48 runs needed from eight overs, Pakistan found a way to panic and lose. “Maybe not so great decision making,” Kirsten said at the post-match press conference, when asked to explain the loss.
“We are judges and therefore, cannot act like Mughals of a bygone era ... the writ courts in the guise of doing justice cannot transcend the barriers of law,” the High Court of Karnataka observed while setting aside an order of a single judge, who in 2016 had extended the lease of a public premises allotted to a physically challenged person to 20 years contrary to 12-year period stipulated in the law.