TRS MLAs poaching case | Conflicting orders from Telangana High Court leave Cyberabad police in confusion

Conflicting orders create confusion among police officers as to which order they had to follow

With two single judges of Telangana High Court on October 29 passing contradictory orders in different petitions connected to the alleged poaching of four TRS MLAs by the BJP, Cyberabad police are caught in a strange situation unable to decide their next move in the case.

Justice B. Vijaysen Reddy of the HC, while hearing a writ petition filed by the BJP seeking probe by the CBI or a Special Investigation Team into the poaching case, passed an interim order instructing the police to keep in abeyance the ongoing investigation into the case.

Also read: Telangana CM KCR will respond at an appropriate time: K.T. Rama Rao

Interestingly, a few minutes before he passed the order, another judge of the HC Justice Chillakur Sumalatha instructed the three accused in the case to surrender before Cyberabad Police Commissioner setting aside the ACB special court judge’s order rejecting remand of the three accused in the case. The two conflicting orders have created a confusion among the police officers as to which order they had to follow.

When Additional Advocate General J. Ramchandra Rao brought to the notice of Justice Vijaysen Reddy that the order was in conflict with the order passed by Justice Sumalatha Bench minutes before, the judge said he would not comment on that direction.

He further said that stalling investigation for four days would not hamper progress of the probe. He posted the matter to November 4 for next hearing.

Earlier, Justice Chillakur Sumalatha set aside the order of ACB special court judge rejecting remand of the three accused in the case of MLAs’ poaching. After hearing the criminal revision petition challenging the remand rejection order filed by Cyberabad police for the second consecutive day on October 29, the judge pronounced the order.