![‘Glamorous’ series review: An unabashedly queer show that can’t pull itself free from its past](https://th-i.thgim.com/public/incoming/3w60or/article67008181.ece/alternates/LANDSCAPE_1200/glamorous.jpg)
‘Glamorous’ series review: An unabashedly queer show that can’t pull itself free from its past
The Hindu
‘Glamorous’ emerges from its occasionally dated references, and self-congratulatory clap backs to provide the audience with a casual saccharine watch
A young credulous assistant clashing with an industry-towering snobby boss has formed a solid basis for many an entertainer. From Betty Suarez bumbling around in the early aughts to Ava Daniels figuring her way out in the post-Instagram comedy industry, the dynamic has elicited a loyal audience.
Queering this trusted TV narrative, Netflix’s latest show, Glamorous arrives amid Pride month, aiming to add its name to the list of summer binges. Severely anchoring itself in the beauty-anxious social media world, Glamorous positions itself as the sleek summer-child of its predecessors, however pales in comparison to those that it has been inspired by.
Marco Mejia (Miss Benny), who aims to make it big in the beauty influencer community, attracts the attention of Madolyn Addison (Kim Cattrall), the owner of a luxury makeup brand — ‘Glamorous by Madolyn’. Madolyn plucks Marco from his mall counter job and hires him as her second assistant. This is just one of the many fever-dream scenarios that form Marco’s life and the larger plot of this show. As Madolyn seeks to reinvent a brand that Marco once called bland, the new assistant learns the ropes of an adult job and his adult life.
Their tale of star-crossed mentor-mentee is populated with a generous helping of love triangles, corporate sabotages, unresolved parental issues, several musical performances, and (not enough) drag sequences.
As far as its emotions are concerned, Glamorous wears its genre on its sleeve. It doesn’t betray a lightness that the audience expects, with a steady stream of pop music bookending its episodes. Marco speaks exclusively in a way that feels like he is reading off a YouTube video transcript, and all corners of the office of Glamorous by Madolyn are framed with a lens flare. Creator Jordon Nardino uses all the tools available to convince us of the show’s modernity, of how much shinier it looks than similar shows before it.
At the same time, he keeps a tight lid on the number of vulnerable moments the characters indulge in. Sometimes, it feels like we are watching a very long Instagram Story of their lives, the curated mask never falls. However, the show’s efforts to be a breezy comedy stacks up against itself.
In an attempt to rejuvenate her brand, Madolyn decides to launch a ‘Pride capsule’ collection. The idea is pitched by Marco and gladly accepted by Madolyn to set her apart in the luxury field. Despite receiving great reviews, she finds herself unsatisfied realising that she doesn’t want to do a Pride collection just to make sales during Pride month. She wants to convey a more concrete commitment to its history.
![](/newspic/picid-1269750-20240611003910.jpg)
The Opposition Congress demanded that the government open the Gandhi Vatika Museum, depicting Mahatma Gandhi’s legacy and freedom struggle, built at a cost of ₹85 crore in Jaipur’s Central Park last year, during the Congress-led regime in Rajasthan. The museum has not been opened to the public, reportedly because of the administration’s engagements with the State Assembly and Lok Sabha elections.
![](/newspic/picid-1269750-20240610192527.jpg)
Almaya Munnettam (Lay People to the Fore), group in the Ernakulam-Angamaly Archdiocese of the Syro-Malabar Church opposed to the synod-recommended Mass, rejected a circular issued by Major Archbishop Raphael Thattil and apostolic administrator Bosco Puthur on June 9 to implement the unified Mass in the archdiocese from July 3.
![](/newspic/picid-1269750-20240610183344.jpg)
Pakistan coach Gary Kirsten stated that “not so great decision making” contributed to his side’s defeat to India in the Group-A T20 World Cup clash here on Sunday. The batting unit came apart in the chase, after being well placed at 72 for two. With 48 runs needed from eight overs, Pakistan found a way to panic and lose. “Maybe not so great decision making,” Kirsten said at the post-match press conference, when asked to explain the loss.