
Lawyer should represent client's grievance, not self, observes a Mumbai court
The Hindu
Referring to the lawyer, who argued on behalf of the accused, the court observed that in his argument it appeared that the advocate is against vaccination
A lawyer has to plead the grievance of his party and not his own, a local court in Mumbai has observed while rejecting a plea pertaining to alleged forcible anti-coronavirus vaccination of an accused.
The applicant, through his lawyer, had filed the application in the court seeking action against the police and doctors for forcibly vaccinating him before he was taken to a jail.
When the plea came up for hearing last week, sessions court judge S. J. Gharat rejected it. The detailed court order was made available on Friday.

The High Court of Karnataka on Tuesday ordered the issue of a notice to the State government on a PIL petition, which had complained about disturbances caused to people residing in the localities around the National Public School situated in Rajajinagar 5th block due to use of loudspeakers with high volume in the school and parking of school buses in residential areas.












