The BJP’s decades-long OBC consolidation in Maharashtra sits uneasily with Maratha strongman Ajit Pawar in the NDA
The Hindu
For many years, the BJP had been working on its own social engineering in Maharashtra, based on OBC consolidation
The split in the Shiv Sena and in the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) of the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) may have left a trail of confusion and dismay in its wake within the alliance in Maharashtra, but the party’s active of wooing of Maratha leaders in the form of the NCP’s Ajit Pawar has raised its own series of misgivings within the Maharashtra BJP.
For many years, the BJP had been working on its own social engineering in Maharashtra, based on OBC consolidation, with OBCs estimated at around 52% of the population. With the Maratha vote solidly with leaders such as NCP patriarch Sharad Pawar and the Congress party’s Vilasrao Deshmukh, this was the obvious route for the BJP to take at that time.
This consolidation was created as a counterpoint to Maratha dominance, and challenged in Marathwada, and some parts of western Maharashtra and eastern Vidarbha. “The BJP had in the 1980s itself, under Vasant Rao Bhagwat, the then general secretary (organisation), decided to work on what was called the ‘MaDhaV’ combination, that is, Malis, Dhangars and Vanjaris,” a senior leader in the Maharashtra BJP said.
At that time, leaders like Anna Dange, who belonged to the Dhangar community, and Gopinath Munde, who belonged to the Vanjari community, were promoted by the party. “In fact, it was under Gopinath Munde that the Vanjari community also got the right for reservation in promotions and not in appointments in the State. The Vanjari community falls under the Vimukta Jati Nomadic Tribes (VNJT) category within the OBCs, and get reservations in promotions,” a source said.
“The BJP was earlier pitching Dhangar leader Gopichand Padalkar as a counter to the Maratha dominated politics of the Pawar family, especially in Baramati. He [Padalkar] has taken a very aggressive stance against the Pawars and Maratha dominance,” the source said. With the recent meeting between the two Pawars — rebel nephew Ajit and his uncle Sharad Pawar — doubts are being raised over whether the junior Pawar will support an aggressive campaign in Baramati against his cousin, Supriya Sule, the local MP.
Among other OBC leaders in the BJP are Union Minister Bhagwat Karad, and Ramesh Karad, both of whom belong to the Vanjari community, and Pravin Datke of the Bari community, apart from Mr. Padalkar.
“The entry of Ajit Pawar and his faction of the NCP into the NDA (National Democratic Alliance) and in government with the BJP is a situation of disruption for what was a deliberate and considered social engineering of the Maharashtra BJP, and part of its growth since the 1980s in the State,” the source added. The faultlines between the Maratha and OBC communities were also picked at by the Maratha Kranti Morchas (a series of silent protests) for reservation in 2015, when the BJP’s Devendra Fadnavis was the Chief Minister. That movement was peaceful but the OBC-Maratha differences grew.
“We are judges and therefore, cannot act like Mughals of a bygone era ... the writ courts in the guise of doing justice cannot transcend the barriers of law,” the High Court of Karnataka observed while setting aside an order of a single judge, who in 2016 had extended the lease of a public premises allotted to a physically challenged person to 20 years contrary to 12-year period stipulated in the law.