NGOs flag ‘generalised surveillance’ of citizens in Delhi High Court
The Hindu
The nonprofits alleged that the government was withholding information on the scale of its surveillance apparatus.
The Center for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) and the Software Freedom Law Centre (SFLC) on Thursday flagged what they said was “generalised surveillance” of Indian citizens by the government, in an ongoing case before the Delhi High Court.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan argued on behalf of the non-profits that in a “press release,” the Internet Service Providers Association of India (ISPAI) said that the “government has ordered us to provide all the traffic which goes through the internet to their [Centralised] Monitoring System (CMS).“
Mr. Bhushan was referring to a regulatory submission that was obtained from the Department of Telecommunications in November 2022, where the ISPAI admitted that broadband providers “are mandated to connect their systems to the CMS facility”, and that “law enforcement agencies are provided facility for on-line and real-time monitoring of traffic.”
This regulatory filing, which indicated that law enforcement agencies’ access to real-time communications was far wider than disclosed previously, was first reported by the news portal Entrackr, and the filing was also released publicly by the Internet Freedom Foundation. (This correspondent reported the story for the publication.)
This “effectively means everything— all our private communications, all our emails, all our phone calls, everything will be piped into the Central Monitoring System,” Mr. Bhushan charged in court. Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, representing the Union government, said that similar matters were pending before the Supreme Court, and asked the court for time to respond to SFLC’s affidavit.
“This kind of centralized monitoring [is] taking place through these three systems: the Central Monitoring System, NETRA and NATGRID, these are generalized surveillance [programmes], not [done] on a case-to-case basis,” Mr. Bhushan said, referring to three communications interception systems the government runs to intercept network and call traffic. The government has insisted that it uses these systems with safeguards and due process.
Mr. Bhushan pointed out, however, that the government said in Parliament that the home secretary approves 7,500 to 9,000 interception requests a month. “It is impossible for any single human being to be able to scrutinize these many requests in a month and give permissions on any reasonable basis,” Mr. Bhushan said. “It’s a very serious matter.”
The Opposition Congress demanded that the government open the Gandhi Vatika Museum, depicting Mahatma Gandhi’s legacy and freedom struggle, built at a cost of ₹85 crore in Jaipur’s Central Park last year, during the Congress-led regime in Rajasthan. The museum has not been opened to the public, reportedly because of the administration’s engagements with the State Assembly and Lok Sabha elections.
Almaya Munnettam (Lay People to the Fore), group in the Ernakulam-Angamaly Archdiocese of the Syro-Malabar Church opposed to the synod-recommended Mass, rejected a circular issued by Major Archbishop Raphael Thattil and apostolic administrator Bosco Puthur on June 9 to implement the unified Mass in the archdiocese from July 3.
Pakistan coach Gary Kirsten stated that “not so great decision making” contributed to his side’s defeat to India in the Group-A T20 World Cup clash here on Sunday. The batting unit came apart in the chase, after being well placed at 72 for two. With 48 runs needed from eight overs, Pakistan found a way to panic and lose. “Maybe not so great decision making,” Kirsten said at the post-match press conference, when asked to explain the loss.