Law empowering govt. to prescribe fee even for unaided schools is unconstitutional: Karnataka HC
The Hindu
Court found several provisions of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 and rules framed under this law as contrary to Constitution in so far as their applicability to uniaded schools
In a major setback to the State government, the High Court of Karnataka on Thursday, January 5, declared as unconstitutional Section 48 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, which prohibits even private unaided schools from collecting fee in any name other than in such rate and manner prescribed by the State government.
Also, the Court declared as unconstitutional the Section 5A of the Act, which mandates even the private unaided schools and its employees to take such steps as prescribed by the government to protect safety and security of children, including protection from sexual offences.
Justice E.S. Indiresh passed the order while allowing the petitions filed by the Associated Managements of Primary and Secondary Schools in Karnataka, the managements of Independent CBSE Schools’ Association Karnataka, Association of International Schools, and the Karnataka Private Schools’ Committee, and several private unaided schools.
Similarly, the High Court has declared as unconstitutional Section 2(11A) of the Act, which empowers District Education Regulatory Authority (DERA) headed by Deputy Commissioner of each district to regulate even unaided schools, and Section 124A, which authorises the DERA to impose penalty upto ₹10 lakh even on unaided schools for violating Section 48.
The Court said that these provisions of the Act are violative of Section 14 [right to euality before the law] and Section 19(1)(g) [right to practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business.] of the Constitution of India in so far their applicability to the unaided schools are concerned, as per the law laid down by the apex court on the rights of unaided educational institutions.
The Section 112A, which prescribes punishment of minimum six months and fine up to ₹1 lakh to any employee or member of the management of an educational institution for violating Section 5A has also been found to be violative of the Constitution by the Court.
The Court also declared that the rules, made in 1995 and 1999 restraining all schools from collecting term fees from pre-primary and lower primary students and restricting the amount to be collected in the form of ‘special development fee’, are not applicable to the unaided schools.
“We are judges and therefore, cannot act like Mughals of a bygone era ... the writ courts in the guise of doing justice cannot transcend the barriers of law,” the High Court of Karnataka observed while setting aside an order of a single judge, who in 2016 had extended the lease of a public premises allotted to a physically challenged person to 20 years contrary to 12-year period stipulated in the law.
The High Court of Karnataka on Monday declined to interfere, at present, in the investigation against a Bharatiya Janata Party worker, who is among the accused persons facing charges of circulating obscene clips, related to “morphed” images and videos clips related to Prajwal Revanna, former Hassan MP, in public domain through pen drives and other modes.
The 16th edition of Bhoomi Habba was held on June 8, at the Visthar campus. The festival drew a vibrant crowd who came together to celebrate eco-consciousness through a variety of engaging activities, creative workshops, panel discussions, interactive exhibits and performances, all centered around this year’s theme: “Save Water, Save Lives.”