Court reserves orders on plea for greater representation for women in ‘Senior Counsel’ designation
The Hindu
The case relates to the designation of some lawyers as ‘Senior Counsel’ at the Madras High Court and its Madurai Bench; the petition has asked for 30% of these lawyers to be women; the Women Lawyers Association has intervened in this case
The Madras High Court on Monday reserved orders on a writ petition that insisted that among the lawyers to be designated as Senior Counsel, in the principal seat of the High Court in Chennai as well as its Madurai Bench, at least 30% of them should be women.
A Division Bench of Justices M. Sundar and N. Sathish Kumar deferred their verdict after hearing the counsel representing the petitioner S. Lawrence Vimalraj, a Madurai-based lawyer, as well as the Women Lawyers Association (WLA) which was allowed to intervene in the case.
The petitioner pointed out that the High Court administration had issued a notification in 2020 calling for applications for the designation but did not proceed further with the task. Subsequently, it issued another notification calling for further applications and took up all applications together for scrutiny.
A permanent committee headed by Acting Chief Justice T. Raja had conducted interviews with the eligible candidates and shortlisted some of them. The shortlisted names alone were placed before a Full Court (a body comprising all judges) meeting on December 7 but a decision on the issue was deferred.
Since only a handful of women lawyers had made it to the list, the petitioner insisted on ensuring greater representation for them. The WLA insisted that the entire list of eligible candidates must be placed before the Full Court as was being done in many other High Courts in the country.
During the course of hearing, when the judges wanted to know who had made a mention before the Supreme Court on December 6 with regard to the issue on hand; the counsel representing the writ petitioner as well as the WLA said they were not sure about who had done it.
“We are judges and therefore, cannot act like Mughals of a bygone era ... the writ courts in the guise of doing justice cannot transcend the barriers of law,” the High Court of Karnataka observed while setting aside an order of a single judge, who in 2016 had extended the lease of a public premises allotted to a physically challenged person to 20 years contrary to 12-year period stipulated in the law.
The High Court of Karnataka on Monday declined to interfere, at present, in the investigation against a Bharatiya Janata Party worker, who is among the accused persons facing charges of circulating obscene clips, related to “morphed” images and videos clips related to Prajwal Revanna, former Hassan MP, in public domain through pen drives and other modes.
The 16th edition of Bhoomi Habba was held on June 8, at the Visthar campus. The festival drew a vibrant crowd who came together to celebrate eco-consciousness through a variety of engaging activities, creative workshops, panel discussions, interactive exhibits and performances, all centered around this year’s theme: “Save Water, Save Lives.”