Allahabad HC orders compensation, security to 12-year-old rape survivor
The Hindu
New Delhi In one of the fastest disposed writ petitions, the Allahabad High Court on Tuesday ordered
In one of the fastest disposed writ petitions, the Allahabad High Court on Tuesday ordered officials of Uttar Pradesh to ensure immediate compensation and police security to a 12-year-old rape survivor, who had approached the court on September 8 to terminate her 23-week pregnancy.
The Bench of Justices Attau Rahman Masoodi and Om Prakash Shukla had ordered the termination of pregnancy of the minor on September 12 and it was carried out by a medical team last week. The daughter of a daily wager, the girl was raped by her neighbour in April. The order came after an expert panel of doctors cleared the termination of the pregnancy.
The Bench stated, “We permit it in order to free the victim of the trauma and social miseries ahead.” It added that the tissue of the foetus had to be preserved for the trial of the rape case that is going on.
Ashish Kumar Singh, the lawyer of the survivor, told The Hindu that the court on Tuesday ordered the district administration of the city she belonged to, to ensure compensation was given.
“It also directed the police to give security to the girl and her family as the accused is her neighbour,” said Mr. Singh, who had taken the case pro bono.
Mr. Rajesh Tiwari, the standing counsel in the case, said that the court’s decision came just a week before the limit to pregnancy termination according to the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act.
The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act permits termination of pregnancy for certain categories of women, including a rape survivor, on the grounds that such pregnancy causes grave injury to the mental health of the victims. The act was amended in 2021 , allowing MTP till 24 weeks in some categories.
Soon after the show, the artistes engaged in an interaction with the audience. The responses from the theatre lovers were varied. While a few appreciated the acting and presentation of the plot, many raised serious objections to the content of the play, written in 1983. It was a very eager, academic and lively debate with multiple voices coming in.