
WhatsApp to leave India? Privacy issue that made Supreme Court angry, explained
India Today
Despite the Supreme Court's stern warning over data-sharing and privacy, WhatsApp is not immediately set to leave India but the coming weeks could decide how it must operate here.
For years, WhatsApp has been so deeply woven into daily life in India that it almost feels like a public utility. From family groups and office updates to payments and business chats, the app quietly sits at the centre of digital conversations. That is precisely why the Supreme Court’s sharp warning to WhatsApp’s parent company Meta has caught everyone’s attention. When the Chief Justice said, “If you can’t follow our Constitution, leave India,” it wasn’t just courtroom drama. It was a clear message about how far India is willing to go to protect user privacy. So what exactly made the country’s top court so angry, and does this really mean WhatsApp could be forced to exit India?
The controversy stems from WhatsApp’s 2021 privacy policy update, which was sent to every user. The policy stated that as part of the Facebook family of companies, WhatsApp could share user information with other Meta-owned firms. This data, according to the policy, could be used to operate, improve, customise, and support market services and offerings.
For users, the choice was brutally simple. Either accept the updated policy and continue using WhatsApp, or delete the account altogether. There was no real "opt-out" for data sharing while staying on the platform.
WhatsApp later clarified that personal chats between friends and family remain end-to-end encrypted. However, data shared with businesses on WhatsApp could be collected and used, including for advertising on Facebook. That distinction did little to calm concerns, especially in a country where WhatsApp has a massive reach and influence.
The matter reached the Supreme Court during hearings related to appeals filed by WhatsApp and Meta against a Competition Commission of India order. The CCI had imposed a penalty of Rs 213.14 crore over the policy, calling out its impact on competition and user choice.
During the hearing, the Bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant took an unusually strong stand. The court questioned how consent could be genuine when users were left with a “take it or leave it” situation. Justice Joymalya Bagchi described this as “manufactured consent,” suggesting that users were effectively coerced into agreeing.

Meta has hired the team behind the agentic AI startup Dreamer. The startup was founded by former Google executives Hugo Barra, David Singleton, and Nicholas Jitkoff, who will now work on Meta's agentic AI plans. This announcement comes after Mark Zuckerberg acquired the AI social media platform Moltbook to bolster agentic AI development.

OpenAI is offering big incentives to private equity firms in a bid to raise more funds. The ChatGPT-maker is offering a minimum return rate of 17.5 per cent, as well as early access to its new AI models. As per reports, the Sam Altman-led firm is hoping to secure a stronger footing in the enterprise market following Anthropic's lead.

Claude can now control computer like a human, Anthropic says soon you won't need your laptop anymore
Claude can now get full access to your computer, do tasks by itself Anthropic has launched a new feature for Claude that allows the AI to get complete access to your computer. The AI can then complete tasks on your behalf while you are away. This feature comes just days after the company launched "Dispatch" which allows you to control Claude via your phone.

Samsung has been teasing its upcoming A-series devices since last week, without officially revealing their names. While speculation has largely pointed to the Galaxy A37 and A57, a lengthy video recently surfaced ahead of any official confirmation, revealing the key specs and pricing of the devices.









