Technological advance enabled functioning of judiciary during COVID-19 pandemic, says Justice P. Sathasivam
The Hindu
Former Chief Justice of India and Former Governor of Kerala P. Sathasivam said technological advance facilitated functioning of judiciary during COVID-19 pandemic. He said there was a dire need for systematic and scientific approach to technology integration in the judiciary.
Former Chief Justice of India and former Governor of Kerala P. Sathasivam said technological advance facilitated functioning of judiciary during COVID-19 pandemic. He said there was a dire need for systematic and scientific approach to technology integration in the judiciary.
Speaking at a function organised by The Advocates Association, Erode, to celebrate the centenary year of legendary advocate A.P. Chinnasamy, here on Saturday, Mr. Justice Sathasivam said that the legal fraternity had made available themselves to their clients even during the pandemic.
He said that technological development that facilitated our work during the crisis was indisputable as the crisis had brought new challenges for the administration and functioning of the courts at all levels of the judiciary. Some commentators had expressed concern that conducting proceedings online, particularly by the Supreme Court and the High Courts, would endanger the principle of open court hearings.
“In my view, I personally prefer open court hearings. But, on a positive outlook, I believe that the crisis will serve as a catalyst to unleash the potential of technology to improve success in the judicial system,” he added.
Apart from using modern technology, members of the bar must utilise Lok Adalat Mediation and Conciliation in cases related to land dispute, partition, accident compensation, matrimonial, labour and other issues.
Chief guest, Justice M.M. Sundresh, Judge, Supreme Court of India, who released the souvenir and unveiled the statue of the late advocate A.P. Chinnasamy, said that the efforts that one takes when alive should be meaningful and be a lesson to others. “Others must speak about us even after our death,” he said and recalled the contributions of Chinnasamy and asked young lawyers to learn from him.
Special addresses were given by Justice T.V. Masilamani, Former Judge, High Court of Madras, and sitting Judges of the High Court of Madras, Justice B. Pugalenthi, Justice Anitha Sumanth, Justice D. Krishnakumar and Justice R. Mahadevan.
“We are judges and therefore, cannot act like Mughals of a bygone era ... the writ courts in the guise of doing justice cannot transcend the barriers of law,” the High Court of Karnataka observed while setting aside an order of a single judge, who in 2016 had extended the lease of a public premises allotted to a physically challenged person to 20 years contrary to 12-year period stipulated in the law.
The High Court of Karnataka on Monday declined to interfere, at present, in the investigation against a Bharatiya Janata Party worker, who is among the accused persons facing charges of circulating obscene clips, related to “morphed” images and videos clips related to Prajwal Revanna, former Hassan MP, in public domain through pen drives and other modes.