Karnataka Assembly election results | The BJP’s caste and community calculations fail to deliver
The Hindu
The BJP’s experiments to tinker with the reservation matrix months before the Karnataka State Assembly elections, a series of its decisions that are believed to have riled the influential Lingayat community, and a perceived threat to minorities under the saffron party’s rule
The BJP’s experiments to tinker with the reservation matrix months before the Karnataka State Assembly elections, a series of its decisions that are believed to have riled the influential Lingayat community, and a perceived threat to minorities under the saffron party’s rule, appear to have backfired on the party as the poll outcome indicates.
The party, which was already on the backfoot over the demand for reservation by the Panchamsalis, the numerically stronger Veerashaiva-Lingayat subsect, and “forced” stepping down of Lingayat strongman B.S. Yediyurappa from the post of Chief Minister, seem to have further cornered the Linagayat narrative alongside the ignominious exits of former Chief Minister Jagadish Shettar and former Deputy Chief Minister Lakshman Savadi.
The powerful land-owning community of the north Karnataka region appears to have backed the Congress in this election, with 34 Veerashaiva-Lingayats getting elected on the Congress ticket as opposed to only 18 elected on the BJP ticket. In the 2018 Assembly election, 38 BJP legislators were Veerashaiva-Lingayats, following the row over the movement for a separate Lingayat religion that resulted in the Congress having only 16 Veerashaiva-Lingayat legislators.
Since 2008, when the first BJP government was formed riding on Lingayat support, the 2023 results threw up the highest number of Lingayat legislators for the Congress.
Another big loss for the BJP came from reserved constituencies for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST). Tinkering with the SCs’ internal reservation was resented by the communities and resulted in sporadic violence. While the BJP government claimed credit for taking a “historic decision” on increasing the quota matrix, it fell short of providing a framework to back it against any legal challenge, a point that was raised repeatedly in the run-up to the elections. The Congress recorded big wins in the reserved constituencies, taking 22 out of 36 constituencies reserved for SCs, up from 12 in 2018, and 14 of the 15 constituencies reserved for STs, up from eight in 2018. The most popular ST leader in the State, Minister B. Sriramulu, also had to taste defeat.
The elevation of Mallikarjun Kharge as the All India Congress Committee (AICC) president is also believed to have worked in favour of the Congress as Dalit communities in both the Left and the Right are believed to have voted for the Congress. Traditionally, the Dalit Left votes for the BJP.
The perceived threat to Muslims under the BJP government, which took a number of controversial decisions, including on wearing the hijab, the anti-conversion Bill, the anti-cow slaughter Bill, on azaan (call to prayer), and eventually, the scrapping of 4% reservation to Muslims, appear to have consolidated the minority votes in favour of Congress. While the Janata Dal-Secular (JD-S) was hoping to get a chunk of the minority votes to boost its tally, this does not appear to have worked out, while the BJP had not given a ticket to Muslims.
Pakistan coach Gary Kirsten stated that “not so great decision making” contributed to his side’s defeat to India in the Group-A T20 World Cup clash here on Sunday. The batting unit came apart in the chase, after being well placed at 72 for two. With 48 runs needed from eight overs, Pakistan found a way to panic and lose. “Maybe not so great decision making,” Kirsten said at the post-match press conference, when asked to explain the loss.
“We are judges and therefore, cannot act like Mughals of a bygone era ... the writ courts in the guise of doing justice cannot transcend the barriers of law,” the High Court of Karnataka observed while setting aside an order of a single judge, who in 2016 had extended the lease of a public premises allotted to a physically challenged person to 20 years contrary to 12-year period stipulated in the law.