
How golgappas, Bangladesh shooter shot down BCB's security alarm
India Today
What Bangladesh's Cricket Board framed as a security concern in India has been exposed through reality. A Bangladeshi shooter is competing in New Delhi, American cricketers are enjoying golgappas on Mumbai's streets, and teams are moving freely. These have exposed how Bangladeshi alarm was about selective politics.
The Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB)'s claim that India was unsafe for its cricketers collapsed not because anything changed, but because of its own contradictions. Days after Dhaka's cricket board refused to send its team to India for the T20 World Cup citing security concerns, a Bangladeshi shooter was cleared by Dhaka to land in New Delhi to compete in the Asian Shooting Championships.
Soon after, American cricketers, who landed in Mumbai for the T20 World Cup, were filmed by locals casually enjoying golgappa (panipuri) on the streets of the city. Meanwhile, other international teams landed, trained and are moving freely across the country.
This contrast to the BCB's claims laid bare how Dhaka's security alarm was selective, political, and limited only to cricket. In the process, Dhaka's credibility has taken a hit, both internationally and at home.
The BCB withdrew from the T20 World Cup after Bangladeshi pacer Mustafizur Rahman was controversially released from his IPL contract. The situation reached an impasse after the ICC rejected the BCB'S request to move their matches to Sri Lanka.
Then in January, the BCB and officials of the Muhammad Yunus administration publicly said that it was "not safe" for Bangladeshi cricketers to play in India. The claim was sweeping, and covered players, support staff, journalists, and officials. The decision was used to justify Bangladesh's refusal to travel for the ICC Men's T20 World Cup matches scheduled in India.
BCB president Nazmul Hossain said security concerns made playing in India unsafe. Youth and Sports Adviser Asif Nazrul added a layer of nationalism, arguing that "national dignity" was at stake. Despite an ICC security assessment reportedly finding no specific threat to the Bangladeshi contingent in India, Dhaka held firm. Eventually, Bangladesh withdrew and was replaced by Scotland.

This moment comes days after the Supreme Court allowed Harish Rana to die with dignity – a historic first court-ordered case of passive euthanasia in India. The court acknowledged the medical opinion that Rana will never recover and that the tubes that feed him and keep him alive are only prolonging his pain.












