
Why Supreme Court rulings have revived debate on sedition law
India Today
First introduced in 1870, the primary objective of the sedition law was to deal with “increasing Wahabi activities” in India during those times as they posed a challenge to the British colonial government.
Following a series of observations and rulings by the judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court this year, first in February-March and now May-June, eminent personalities from various walks of life have demanded abolition or amendment to the sedition law as it exists today in India. Among those calling for a change in the sedition law are politicians such as Kapil Sibal, celebrity Dia Mirza, historian S Irfan Habib and filmmaker Pritish Nandy, who is a former parliamentarian.
A prominent seer, Pranavananda Swamiji, alleged that mutts backing Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar to take over the top post were denied any allocation in the state budget presented by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah. He reiterated his support for Shivakumar to take over as the chief minister.

India's original Dhurandhar, Ravindra Kaushik, rose from acting at college theatres, to infiltrating the Pakistan Army as a RAW Agent. He provided critical intelligence on Pakistani troop movements and the country's nuclear programme, but died a lonely death after his betrayal and subsequent capture by the ISI.

According to the police, 19-year-old Sachin Dharmendrabhai Chaudhary, who works as a labourer, had borrowed the money before expressing his inability to repay it immediately, police said. He was allegedly threatened with his life over the delay in repayment. Fearing for his life, Sachin immediately alerted the police.










