When Jamsetji Tata did not shy away from shutting first business of Tata Group
The Hindu
Jamsetji Tata's strategic decision to exit the unviable Tata Shipping Line in the 1890s showcased his bold leadership.
Known for the successful ventures he established, Jamsetji Tata, founder of the Tata Group, did not shy away from taking tough calls and making strategic choices to exit from unviable business as shown by the shutting of Tata Shipping Line in the 1890s, according to a new book.
He had started the 'Tata Line', the first-ever business of the Tata Group which bore the Tata name, with a view to challenge the monopoly of the English P.&O., the pre-eminent shipping line that carried exports from India during the 1880s and 1890s.
The English P.&O. which had the support of the then British India government, had a virtual monopoly on shipping from India and charged Indian merchants exorbitant freight rates, while providing greater rebates on British and Jewish firms thereby creating an uneven playing field for Indians, according to the book titled 'Jamsetji Tata - Powerful Learnings For Corporate Success'.
"Jamsetji Tata, who was in the textile business at that time, was adversely impacted, and he felt that this was very unfair to Indians," wrote the authors, R. Gopalakrishnan and Harish Bhat, two Tata group veterans, in their recently released book published by Penguin Random House India.
The pioneer of modern Indian industry then travelled to Japan to strike a collaboration with Nippon Yusen Kaisha (NYK), the largest shipping line of that country, which agreed to partner provided Jamsetji took "an equal risk in the venture and ran the ships on his own".
Afterwards, he chartered an English ship 'Annie Barrow' at a fixed rate of 1,050 pounds per month and made it the first vessel of the new shipping company, which he called the 'Tata Line' — this was the first ever business of the Tata Group which bore the Tata name.
Jamsetji felt that this venture would benefit not only his textile business but also the entire Indian textile industry through lower shipping rates of ₹12 per tonne of freight as compared to ₹19 per tonne charged by P.&O and break the latter's monopoly.
Wholesale price inflation hits 11-month high at 2.13%, driven by rising crude prices and increased costs across various sectors.
Kerala's wellness sector faces uncertainty due to the West Asian crisis, impacting tourism and threatening economic stability.
Experts link Punjab's distress migration to economic stagnation and job mismatches, highlighting systemic failures in political leadership.
India's merchandise exports remain flat in February, with Commerce Secretary warning of a potential dip in March due to trade constraints.
Hard Rock International closes 10 outlets in India, including three cafes in Bengaluru, while Goa hotel remains open.
The booming market for artificial intelligence servers brought Taiwan's Foxconn a 24 percent jump in annual net profit, the company said
In a statement on its website, Adobe said it has in recent years streamlined its sign-up and cancellation processes and made them more transparent.
Stock markets recover as Sensex and Nifty bounce back following a three-day slump, driven by value-buying in blue-chip stocks.
U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration is set to receive a roughly $10 billion fee from investors in the recently completed deal to take control of TikTok’s U.S. business, the Wall Street Journal reported
Meta is planning sweeping layoffs that could affect 20% or more of the company, three sources familiar with the matter told Reuters
Learn how to choose the best personal loan lender by evaluating eligibility, interest rates, and borrowing experience.
Discover why pension planning is essential in modern India to ensure financial security and peace during retirement.
The U.S. has launched two investigations under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 against India and other economies to examine practices that may be ‘unreasonable or discriminatory and burden or restrict U.S. commerce’. One probe examines whether countries, including India, are using excess manufacturing capacity to export to the U.S. in a manner that hurts American businesses, while another looks at whether countries have taken ‘sufficient steps’ to prohibit imports of goods produced with forced labour.