Need to recalibrate Union-State relations as centralisation has failed to deliver: M.K. Stalin

M.K. Stalin advocates for recalibrating Union-State relations to restore Sate autonomy and improve governance effectiveness in India.

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin has made a strong case for a recalibration of Union-State relations, pointing out that the objective is not to weaken the Union but to right-size it, allowing it to concentrate on genuinely national responsibilities while restoring to the States the autonomy essential for effective governance.

“India now stands at a constitutional juncture that calls for a recalibration of Union-State relations. Such recalibration would not diminish national unity; it would deepen it by aligning authority with responsibility,” he said in a letter addressed to Chief Ministers, political leaders, constitutional experts, and journalists across the country.

He also enclosed a copy of Part I of the report of the High-Level Committee on Union-State Relations. The report was prepared by a committee headed by Justice Kurian Joseph, with former IAS officer Ashok Vardhan Shetty and economist N. Naganathan as members.

Mr. Stalin argued that through successive constitutional amendments, expansive Union legislation on subjects in the Concurrent List, conditional Finance Commission transfers, and Centrally-sponsored schemes with rigid templates, the balance of power had tilted even further towards the Union.

“Large Ministries exist in New Delhi that duplicate State functions and often attempt to steer State priorities through micromanagement and procedural oversight. In an inversion of democratic hierarchy, plenary State legislation in Concurrent List subjects is at times sought to be diluted through subordinate rule-making at the national level,” he pointed out.

According to Mr. Stalin, such centralisation might have been defensible if it had demonstrably delivered superior outcomes. “But by comparison with decentralised federations, global benchmarks, or India’s own aspirations, the record of India’s centralised governance is unpersuasive,” he said.