
Can court proceedings be recorded?
India Today
A cop being caught recording the proceedings of a Delhi court has sparked a controversy. Legal experts delve into details to determine if it is legal.
A incident of a police official being caught by a judge while audio recording a Delhi court’s proceedings has sparked a controversy.
The judge in the Delhi district court on Tuesday stopped the hearing after an official of the Delhi Police’s special branch was found recording the hearing.
The judge asked the police official who had authorised him to do so and confiscated his phone before resuming the hearing.
India today spoke to legal experts to understand what the law says about this and what is the punishment for such actions.
According to the Supreme Court’s rules on video conferencing, any unauthorised usage of live-streaming will be punishable under the Indian Copyright Act, 1957, Information Technology Act, 2000, and other provisions of law, including the law of Contempt.
No person shall use a recording device for recording or for transcribing the proceedings, other than those authorised by the court.
Supreme Court advocate KV Dhananjay, who once fought a legal battle for audio-video recording of the court proceedings said, "If it is an in-camera proceeding which is not permissible for general members of the public to attend and somebody attends such a proceeding without authorisation, he could be punished if he knowingly and intentionally attended that proceeding."

A prominent seer, Pranavananda Swamiji, alleged that mutts backing Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar to take over the top post were denied any allocation in the state budget presented by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah. He reiterated his support for Shivakumar to take over as the chief minister.

India's original Dhurandhar, Ravindra Kaushik, rose from acting at college theatres, to infiltrating the Pakistan Army as a RAW Agent. He provided critical intelligence on Pakistani troop movements and the country's nuclear programme, but died a lonely death after his betrayal and subsequent capture by the ISI.

According to the police, 19-year-old Sachin Dharmendrabhai Chaudhary, who works as a labourer, had borrowed the money before expressing his inability to repay it immediately, police said. He was allegedly threatened with his life over the delay in repayment. Fearing for his life, Sachin immediately alerted the police.










