U.S. judge questions Pentagon’s motives for labeling Anthropic as a security threat in battle over AI

A federal judge weighing the merits of the Pentagon’s designation of rising Silicon Valley star Anthropic as a security threat repeatedly questioned the government’s reasons for vilifying the company

A U.S. federal judge weighing the merits of the Pentagon’s designation of rising Silicon Valley star Anthropic as a security threat repeatedly questioned the government’s reasons for vilifying the company following a dispute over how its artificial intelligence technology can be used in war

During a 90-minute hearing in San Francisco federal court, U.S. District Judge Rita Lin probed into why U.S. President Donald Trump's administration took the extraordinary step of denouncing Anthropic as a supply chain risk after balking at the company's attempt to prevent its AI technology from being deployed in fully autonomous weapons or surveillance of Americans.

“What is troubling to me about these these actions is they don’t seem to be tailored to the national security concerns,” Lin said.

Lin is being asked to issue an emergency order to remove a stigma that Anthropic alleges was unjustifiably applied as part of an “unlawful campaign of retaliation” that provoked the San Francisco-based company to sue the Trump administration earlier this month. Anthropic has also filed a separate and more narrow case in the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C

Although Lin expressed abouts about how Trump administration has treated Anthropic, she didn't issue a ruling Tuesday. Instead, the judge asked for the lawyers in the two sides to file further evidence in the case by Wednesday and indicated she would rule before the end of this week.

The issues underlying the rift extend beyond a contractual dispute between one of technology's biggest AI laboratories and the Trump administration.