
Sedition law stayed until review: Read Supreme Court order here
India Today
The Supreme Court stayed the sedition law till review, asking states and central governments to refrain from filing any FIR under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday stayed the invocation of the sedition charge until the provisions of the law under Section-124 of the Indian Penal Code are examined.
While hearing the petitions challenging the validity of the law on sedition, Chief Justice of India NV Ramana-led Bench said, "We expect that till re-examination of this law is complete it will not be used."
The top court asked states/UTs and central governments to refrain from filing any FIR under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code that pertains to sedition.
READ | Centre takes U-turn, tells Supreme Court that sedition law will be re-examine
It is clear that the Centre agrees that the rigours of section 124A is not in tune with the current situation and it was intended for the time when country was under colonial law. thus centre may reconsider it
The court is to balance civil liberty and the sovereignty of the state. This is a difficult exercise. The petitioner says this law dates back to colonial date. AG also cited how 124A is being misused during Hanuman Chalisa row.
It will be appropriate not to use this provision of law till further reexamination is over.

A prominent seer, Pranavananda Swamiji, alleged that mutts backing Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar to take over the top post were denied any allocation in the state budget presented by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah. He reiterated his support for Shivakumar to take over as the chief minister.

India's original Dhurandhar, Ravindra Kaushik, rose from acting at college theatres, to infiltrating the Pakistan Army as a RAW Agent. He provided critical intelligence on Pakistani troop movements and the country's nuclear programme, but died a lonely death after his betrayal and subsequent capture by the ISI.











