Asian Games | The slide in Asian hockey doesn’t augur well, on or off the field

China's hockey team earned respect with their incredible performance, topping Pool B and advancing to the semifinals. Pakistan and Malaysia, both former champions, were eliminated. China's success shows the rise of the sport in the continent, but the decline of overall standards should be a cause for concern. India must guard against complacency in the semifinals.

The first time Chinese media bothered to speak to one of their hockey players post-match after a week’s hockey action at the Asian Games was on Monday night following the men’s team’s incredible performance that saw it top Pool B and advance to the semifinals of the competition.

Of course, with the host hoarding medals by the dozen every day — it had won 279 at the time of writing with an incredible 154 gold — hockey would unsurprisingly rank low on the priority list. But Monday’s interaction was respect earned against all odds by the World No. 22 side that entered the semifinals of the competition for only the second time ever. 

At the other end of the spectrum were Pakistan and Malaysia — the former an eight-time champion and the latter an eight-times medallist and the only other team besides India in the top-10 — being dumped out of the competition, left to wonder about what might have been, being wistful of the past and pondering their future. And as much as the rise of China means well for the sport, the decline of the game’s overall standards in the continent should be a cause for concern for Asian administrators.

Barely two months ago, it was a different Malaysian team that gave India a run for its money in the final of the Asian Champions Trophy and sent out a warning to other teams for the Asiad, where China finished last with one draw and four losses. But even back then, there were signs that this Chinese team would not be a pushover at home. Against Malaysia, the hero again was goalkeeper Caiyu Wang, bringing about some incredible saves. 

“The will to win was not there...,” said Malaysia coach Arul Anthoni Selvaraj. “Our 1-vs-1 defending wasn’t great. We are better at playing hockey but they were better physically and used that well. They played intelligent hockey and relied on counter-attacks, overheads, long balls and accurate penalty corners. We have only ourselves to blame for the defeat against South Korea and the draw against China. We have to sit as a group and assess the situation, see where we are headed.”

Nevertheless, Malaysia did come up with some decent performances through the tournament and has been doing reasonably well in recent times, something that cannot be said for Pakistan. The erstwhile powerhouse and perhaps the most successful team in hockey history across competitions has appeared such a poor imitation of its former self that it’s not even funny. Even at ACT, despite the losses, Pakistan showed traces of individual brilliance and a willingness to fight. Here, it looked like a bunch of schoolboys being thrown into the deep end without preparation or support.

Coaches were changed after ACT, infighting continued, there was no clarity on personnel or purpose and the same players who impressed in Chennai were listless and invisible. Captain Umar Bhutta looked pained to be on the field, helplessly moving around to marshal his troops, aware it was a lost cause. And while head coach Saeed Khan was quoted as listing multiple reasons for poor performance in Pakistan media, he conspicuously omitted one – moving out of the past’s shadow, something that held Indian hockey back for decades before a system overhaul in 2010.