Trump's Bruised Hand Is Looking Pretty Swollen
HuffPost
It could be the light, but in addition to the now-familiar bandage covering the bruise, the president's hand appeared more than a little swollen.
The persistent bruise on President Donald Trump’s right hand was on full display during Friday’s 2026 FIFA World Cup draw when Trump extended it to shake hands with FIFA President Gianni Infantino while being awarded a so-called peace prize.
It could be the light, but in addition to the now-familiar bandage covering the bruise, the president’s hand appeared more than a little swollen.
And earlier this week, the 79-year-old was spotted at a Cabinet meeting with two large Band-Aids on his right hand. He also appeared to doze off during the meeting.
In February, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to questions about a bruise on Trump’s hand by claiming the bruise came from working too hard.
“President Trump has bruises on his hand because he’s constantly working and shaking hands all day, every day,” Leavitt said at the time.
Will the justices throw out a bedrock legal principle that has defined American citizenship for over a century?
A spokesperson for the FBI denied the report, calling it "hogwash."
The agreement follows a weeks-long bidding war for the storied company.
Trump's Democratic foe introduced the “Presidential Walk of Fatigue."
“I’m laughing because..."
The president's faux apology exposed what he really wants, said social media users.
NASA said the discovery shows such "building blocks" of life are "widespread throughout the solar system."
The "Daily Show" host named the two responses that Trump churns out when he's under fire.
The podcaster described the president as a "79-year-old kid" while talking to Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.
A judge dismissed the previous mortgage fraud prosecution encouraged by President Donald Trump.
Adm. Frank “Mitch” Bradley spoke with lawmakers on Thursday about the recent attacks on an alleged drug boat in the Caribbean.
"Wait, what??????" Katie Couric wrote in response to Kirk's opinion.
The GOP senator claims it was “entirely lawful” that the U.S. military launched a follow-up strike to kill survivors of its first strike in the Sept. 2 attack.