
Should you be relaxed or worried about Knicks’ start? It’s complicated
NY Post
Sometimes, every now and again, you get a year straight out of a fantasy, so there’s no reason to suffer from what we’ll call “Small Sample Sepsis.”
In 1984, the Detroit Tigers started their season 35-5. There was, quite literally, no reason for a Tigers fan to suffer even an ounce of angst after Cinco de Mayo. Forty years later, the 2024-25 Cleveland Cavaliers began their season 15-0 and 33-4. It was pretty apparent by the end of January that the Cavs were going to cruise to the No. 1 seed.
Those seasons are rare. So are the ultra extremes in the other direction: Despite all the positive vibes emanating from Cincinnati last week, the Jets still started this season 0-7. They are that bad. The Nets look like a calamity — as expected — and now we wait to see if they can match the zinc standard of the 2009-2010 version, when they were still playing in Jersey and started the season 0-18 and 2-29 and 5-52 on the way to 12-70. No mystery attached to any season like that.
Most every other season … well, it’s a war between “I’ve seen enough!” and “we haven’t seen enough.” The 1986 Mets, for example, started 2-3; they squeaked by at 108-54. The 1998 Yankees famously started 1-4 and there was already a Joe Torre Watch; the Yankees went 113-44 the rest of the way. Turns out they were fine.

Cade Cunningham, almost inarguably the best player in the East this season, is likely out for the remainder of the regular season. That’s the word out of Detroit following the depressing news that Cunningham punctured a lung when he took a knee to his side Tuesday from Washington’s Tre Johnson while chasing a loose ball.

Wednesday was another positive day at Yankees camp. For the first time since March 6, 2025 — an outing in which he knew “something wasn’t right,” which began a weeks-long saga that ended on the operating table for Tommy John surgery — Gerrit Cole was back on a mound and facing hitters in game action.











