Shiv Sena (UBT) open to alliance with MNS for Maharashtra’s benefit, says Sanjay Raut
The Hindu
Shiv Sena leaders show willingness to set aside differences for the welfare of Maharashtra and Marathi-speaking people.
Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut on Tuesday (June 10, 2025) stated that his party was willing to take “a step forward or backward” for the welfare of Maharashtra and the Marathi-speaking populace, dismissing any political ego in the matter.
His remarks come amid growing speculation of a possible reconciliation between the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena (UBT) and Raj Thackeray’s Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS).
Mr. Raut, a Rajya Sabha MP, emphasised that the party’s priority was safeguarding the interests of Maharashtra and reasserting its claim over Mumbai. “We are ready to take a step ahead or back. There is no political ego in it,” he told reporters.
The possibility of a thaw between the estranged Thackeray cousins – Uddhav and Raj – has gained traction after recent statements from both leaders hinted at overlooking past differences for a larger cause. While Mr. Raj Thackeray remarked that uniting for the “Marathi manoos” would not be difficult, Mr. Uddhav Thackeray expressed willingness to move beyond “trivial issues”, provided those working against Maharashtra’s interests were sidelined.
Echoing the sentiment, Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Aaditya Thackeray on Monday (June 9, 2025) said his party was open to aligning with any group committed to working for Mumbai, Maharashtra, and Marathi-speaking people with a “clean heart and mind”. However, he clarified that no formal discussions had taken place yet.
“Talks are only in the media so far. Someone gave a call (for alliance), and we responded. People will see the next steps when they happen,” Mr. Aaditya Thackeray, a former State Minister, told reporters.
The potential alliance, if materialised, could mark a significant political shift nearly two decades after the bitter split between the two factions. Mr. Uddhav Thackeray has maintained that the final decision would reflect the people’s will, stating, “Whatever people want, will happen.”













