SC verdict on Manish Sisodia bail plea on October 30

In an earlier hearing, the court had orally observed that the ED had to establish an unbroken chain of evidence linking Mr. Sisodia with the liquor lobby.

A Supreme Court Bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and S.V.N. Bhatti is scheduled on October 30 to deliver its judgment on a plea for bail filed by former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia, who is facing money laundering charges in the liquor policy scam case.

The judgment is authored by Justice Khanna, who while reserving the case for verdict on October 17 had asked the Enforcement Directorate (ED) how an offence under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) would be made out in the absence of a bribery charge against Mr. Sisodia, represented by senior advocate A.M. Singhvi.

“If the charge of a bribe is not part of the predicate offence, it may be difficult for you to prove a case under the PMLA. If you had said bribe of ₹2.2 crore was paid for tweaking the policy, yes. But you cannot create a predicate offence in your PMLA case. We cannot go on an assumption,” Justice Khanna had addressed Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju, appearing for the Central agency.

In an earlier hearing, the court had orally observed that the ED had to establish an unbroken chain of evidence linking Mr. Sisodia with the liquor lobby.

It had said that no offence under the PMLA could be made out unless proof was there to show that the former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister was actively connected with proceeds of crime.

“You have to establish a chain. The money has to flow from the liquor lobby to the person. We know it is difficult to establish the chain as everything is done undercover… but that is where your competence lies,” Justice Khanna had told Mr. Raju.

Justice Khanna had noted that a policy may be changed to generate money following pressure from a particular lobby, but provisions of the PMLA would be attracted only after the proceeds of a crime, in this case bribery, were given or paid.