SC to examine better regulatory framework for ethical conduct of electronic media
The Hindu
The Supreme Court on Monday said a fine of just ₹1 lakh is hardly a deterrent for television channels who indulge in unethical conduct on air, and the fine should ideally be more than the profits the media outlets make from the entire show. ‘Media went berserk after that actor’s [Sushant Singh Rajput] death… you virtually pre-empt the entire investigation,” Chief Justice Chandrachud said.
The Supreme Court on Monday said a fine of just ₹1 lakh is hardly a deterrent for television channels which indulge in unethical conduct on air, and the fine should ideally be more than the profits the media outlets make from the entire show.
A Bench headed by Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud noted that the ₹1 lakh fine was fixed in 2008, and had not been revised since.
The court issued notice to the National Broadcasters and Digital Association (NBDA), an independent electronic media watchdog, the Centre and other respondents on the question of “strengthening the framework” of regulations.
“We are as much concerned about free speech as the channels are… but you presume guilt of a person in your shows and not innocence of the person until he or she is proven guilty… Media went berserk after that actor’s [Sushant Singh Rajput] death… you virtually pre-empt the entire investigation,” Justice Chandrachud said.
Senior advocate Arvind P. Datar, appearing for NBDA along with advocate Nisha Bhambhani, said he would consult Justice (retired) A.K. Sikri, the current NBDA chairperson, and former NBDA head, Justice (retired) R.V. Raveendran, on how to put “some bite” into its regulations.
“If at the end of all this violation, you [NBDA] are going to impose ₹1 lakh fine, which channel is going to be motivated? Your fine must be more than the profits a channel makes from the entire show. We do not want any censorship over the media, but the fine should be effective... The government does not want to be in this space. You are expected to self-regulate your content. How will a fine of ₹1 lakh deter an errant channel? This amount was fixed 18 years ago, have you not thought of revising it?” the Chief Justice asked NBDA.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, for the Centre, said NBDA was only one of the regulatory bodies. Mr. Mehta said the court had to intervene to lay down comprehensive regulatory guidelines on ethical conduct on air.
he Tamil Nadu Government will take appropriate decision to protect the welfare and livelihood of Manjolai tea estate workers as Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation, which is managing the tea gardens for the past 90-odd years, is about to wind up its operations in near future, Speaker M. Appavu has said.