Pro-Trump New York Post Shreds RFK Jr. In Brutal Editorial: ‘Paranoid Kook’
HuffPost
Donald Trump's health and human services secretary's "tinfoil hat is blocking out all sense," the tabloid's editorial board slammed.
The New York Post editorial board on Thursday went scorched earth on Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
The usually pro-Donald Trump and MAGA tabloid — owned by conservative billionaire Rupert Murdoch ― flamed vaccine skeptic Kennedy’s appearance at a tense Senate hearing, during which he was ripped by lawmakers over his vaccine policies. Read the full editorial here.
Kennedy made it “crystal clear” that he “won’t be restoring sanity to our public-health bureaucracies, desperate as the need is,” the Post wrote.
In fact, it slammed him for coming off “as a paranoid kook connecting red strings on a whiteboard.”
“Kennedy’s tinfoil hat is blocking out all sense, to the point where he can’t even acknowledge basic facts that don’t align with his priors,” it added.
Will the justices throw out a bedrock legal principle that has defined American citizenship for over a century?
A spokesperson for the FBI denied the report, calling it "hogwash."
The agreement follows a weeks-long bidding war for the storied company.
Trump's Democratic foe introduced the “Presidential Walk of Fatigue."
“I’m laughing because..."
The president's faux apology exposed what he really wants, said social media users.
NASA said the discovery shows such "building blocks" of life are "widespread throughout the solar system."
The "Daily Show" host named the two responses that Trump churns out when he's under fire.
The podcaster described the president as a "79-year-old kid" while talking to Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.
A judge dismissed the previous mortgage fraud prosecution encouraged by President Donald Trump.
Adm. Frank “Mitch” Bradley spoke with lawmakers on Thursday about the recent attacks on an alleged drug boat in the Caribbean.
"Wait, what??????" Katie Couric wrote in response to Kirk's opinion.
The GOP senator claims it was “entirely lawful” that the U.S. military launched a follow-up strike to kill survivors of its first strike in the Sept. 2 attack.