
‘Pichaikkaran 2’ movie review: Vijay Antony fails to recreate his magic, due to a mediocre story and insipid writing
The Hindu
With ‘Pichaikkaran 2’, Vijay Antony, for the first time, takes over directing duties too, but it’s the acting part where he shines the most
In a film industry that has almost never gotten a sequel right, standalone sequels feel like an excuse to cash in on the popularity of a hit film and Pichaikkaran 2 is a textbook example of it. The 2016 film Pichaikkaranwasn’t a revelation but amidst an overdose of action and mother sentiment, director Sasi squeezed in an interesting plot that worked majorly for its mass moments. Pichaikkaran 2 tries to maintain the idea as a scaffolding to build a new story from scratch, and though it gets an intriguing idea, it fails to make headway.
Vijay Antony has shown his abundant inclination towards playing multiple characters. Of the thirteen films he has played the lead in, the ones with multiple roles, including his latest release, are five. While he played a billionaire who moonlighted as a beggar in Pichaikkaran, the sequel has him playing billionaire Vijay Gurumoorthy as well as a beggar named Sathya. While the first film was high on mother sentiment, we’ve got Tamil cinema’s age-old sister sentiment this time. If a rich man had to be poor for a month in the first film, a poor man amasses a wealth of one lakh crores in the sequel. But apart from the dichotomy and parallels, the two films don’t have anything else in common.
For those working for Vijay Gurumoorthy, greed, as always, gets the better of them and they need to find a nobody whose brain can be transplanted into Vijay’s body. They track down an orphan/beggar in the form of Sathya and let science — that’s understandable to only Stephen Hawkings and Michio Kaku — take its course. They dispose of Sathya’s body in the Dubai desert, erase Vijay’s mind like it’s a hard drive that can be formatted, and voila, we’ve got Vijay’s body with Sathya’s mind. The first 20-odd minutes of Pichaikkaran 2, where the above sequence happens, is over-the-top in a manner that’s unique to Vijay Antony starrers, something I particularly enjoyed in his films like Thimiru Pudichavan, Kodiyil Oruvan, and of course, Pichaikkaran. But, from there, the film goes downhill.
ALSO READ: ‘Thuppakki’ to ‘Petta’ to ‘Pichaikkaran’: Tamil cinema’s 15 best masala movies of the decade
Sathya is obviously no Admiral General Haffaz Aladeen’s simpleton body double from The Dictator, and once he climbs the social ladder, it’s only he who can get himself back down. But keeping in tradition with Tamil cinema heroes’ toxic relationship with the Robin Hood syndrome, Sathya decides to use his wealth to provide basic needs to the impoverished at subsidised prices. He even coins the term ‘Bikili’ to the opulent folks who stay so by basking on the hard work of the poor; this apparently makes him ‘Anti Bikili.’
With Pichaikkaran 2, Vijay Antony takes over the responsibilities of playing the lead, editor, music director, and for the first time, direction duties too. It’s the acting part where he shines the most. He brings in a variation between the two characters he plays — Vijay is a money-minded business magnate who reaches out to a sanitiser dispenser after holding his dead father’s hands, while Sathya kisses the feet of a child for whom he wishes he had always been there. But the script doesn’t really give him the space to do much. The idea of placing a poor man in the shoes of an affluent one is anything but new — we’ve seen MGR do it in Enga Veettu Pillai, Rajinikanth from the days of Billa, Athisaya Piravi, Uzhaippali and even Sivaji. It’s one of the oldest tropes of double-action films, and what baffles me more is the shockingly simple treatment.
There are moments like the one right before the intermission and when Sathya calls up the Chief Minister to uphold justice that feels similar to the mass moments we loved in Pichaikkaran. But they are few and far between, and by the time he announces an Anti Bikili mall where one can get soaps for 3 Rs, toothbrushes for 7 Rs and an actual house for 23,000 Rs, you completely give up on the film. So much that you actually don’t mind a shoddy VFX shot of a helicopter taking off a huge piece of cloth over a building to unveil an entire mall.

A vacuum cleaner haunted by a ghost is the kind of one-liner which can draw in a festival audience looking for a little light-hearted fun to fill the time slots available between the “heavier” films which require much closer attention. A useful ghost, the debut feature of Thai filmmaker Ratchapoom Boonbunchachoke being screened in the world cinema category at the 30th International Film Festival of Kerala (IFFK), even appears so in the initial hour. Until, the film becomes something more, with strong undercurrents of Thailand’s contemporary political history.

Sustainability is not an add-on, but stamped firmly into the process: every piece is biodegradable, waste-free and unembellished, free from glitter or beads. “Products should be sustainable and biodegradable so that our planet is not harmed,” says Anu Elizabeth Alexander, a student of Sishya, Adyar. At a recent exhibition, the stars she made sold the fastest, followed by the small diamonds. “I would like people to know about the process, how it is created, and that it is sustainable,” says Anu. Infanta Leon from Kotturpuram developed an interest in crochet as a teenager. It was a hobbyhorse that evolved into a steed that would help her embark on a journey of identity-shaping creative engagement. She started making Christmas-themed decor two years ago, spurred by a desire to craft safe, eco-friendly toys for children. “With a toddler at home, and my elder child sensitive to synthetic materials, I wanted to create items that were gentle, durable and tactile,” she explains. Her earliest creations were small amigurumi toys which gradually evolved into ornaments that could adorn Christmas trees with warmth and charm.











