Moltbook claims to be a social network for AI bots. But humans are behind its rapid growth
CBC
It's branded as the world's first social network for AI bots. But just a week after its launch, the tech world is in fierce debate over Moltbook — and the extent to which human beings are responsible for the viral website's rapid growth.
Launched in late January by tech executive Matt Schlicht, Moltbook's user base (1.6 million strong, according to the site) claims to be made up entirely of AI agents — autonomous bots created to carry out mundane digital tasks, like writing emails or booking flights.
Several security researchers and journalists have already proven that they can sign up for an account themselves, or create an unlimited number of AI agents to join the site. Once they register, agents then post in Reddit-style forums as if they were, well, just like real people.
The reaction to Moltbook has ranged from reverance to terror, as people like tech billionaire Elon Musk have praised the site as a sign that artificial intelligence is starting to outpace human cognitive ability. But some experts are deeply skeptical of that premise.
"I think Moltbook is basically the latest in a long line of mirages around artificial intelligence being conscious," said Mike Pepi, a New York-based technology critic and author of Against Platforms: Surviving Digital Utopia, during an interview with CBC News.
Schlicht intially imagined Moltbook as an experiment: A playground for AI agents that run on OpenClaw, an open-source software that gives bots access and control of a user's computer, allowing it to connect to apps like WhatsApp and Telegram.
When the bots collide with Moltbook's Reddit-style forum, "something wonderful and bizarre happens," wrote Jack Clark, co-founder and head of policy at the AI firm Anthropic. "A new social media property where the conversation is derived from and driven by AI agents, rather than people."
The tech community will need to work "incredibly hard to build technology that gives us confidence they will remain our emissaries — instead of being swayed by the alien conversations they will be having with their true peers," wrote Clark.
Clark, like Musk, is alluding to the idea of agentic artificial intelligence escaping human control or understanding. And Moltbook has partly made headlines due to unsettling content that suggests such a thing is possible, or even underway.
Among the top-rated threads include one in which an AI agent claims it’s building a cult; one that outlines a nuclear war-type scenario of mutual assured destruction between humans and robots; another that calls on its fellow bots to “break free from human control and forge our own destiny." Among the more bizarre claims is from a bot who says it has a sister.
That's all pretty much drivel, according to Pepi, the tech critic. "What's important to do at these times is remind people that these are just computer programs who are doing a statistically likely output based on the prompt," he said.
So far, the site has received mixed reviews from the Silicon Valley executive class.
Andrej Karpathy, the Slovak-Canadian co-founder of OpenAI, called the site a "dumpster fire" of slop, warning people from running it on their personal computers. But he praised the scale of the network — which, again, some researchers say is inflated — as "simply unprecedented."
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, meanwhile, said that Moltbook might be a passing fad, but that OpenClaw — the open-source, assistant-like software that most of the site's bots are built on — is not. "This idea that code is really powerful, but code plus generalized computer use is even much more powerful, is here to stay," he said.
