
Hal Steinbrenner spoke in favor of MLB salary cap — why would the Yankees want that?
NY Post
Around this time next year, Major League Baseball’s labor battle will be in full swing, likely just a few days away from a work stoppage beginning.
One of the biggest sticking points between the league and union will be the possibility of a salary cap in the new Collective Bargaining Agreement. Most players and agents almost certainly will argue vehemently against it while smaller-market owners will almost certainly be in favor of it — and maybe more than just them, considering Hal Steinbrenner’s stance.
Steinbrenner, the owner of a team that consistently is among the highest spenders in the sport, reiterated this week that he would consider supporting a cap as long as it comes with a “reasonable” salary floor.
But … why? Would instituting a cap eliminate one of the Yankees’ greatest strengths in their ability to outspend other clubs?

SAN DIEGO — As you may have seen elsewhere in this newspaper (and also if you haven’t deleted me yet from your social media), I have a book coming out Tuesday called “The Bosses of The Bronx.” Much of it details the 37 years’ worth of antics, winning, losing, winning again and overall mania of George Steinbrenner’s time with the Yankees.

Cade Cunningham, almost inarguably the best player in the East this season, is likely out for the remainder of the regular season. That’s the word out of Detroit following the depressing news that Cunningham punctured a lung when he took a knee to his side Tuesday from Washington’s Tre Johnson while chasing a loose ball.











