E. Jean Carroll Plans To Spend Defamation Money On 'Something Donald Trump Hates'
HuffPost
“If it will cause him pain for me to give money to certain things, that’s my intent,” Carroll said during her first interview following last week's $83.3 million verdict.
E. Jean Carroll hopes she can get under Donald Trump’s skin with how she spends her $83.3 million defamation settlement.
Last Friday, a jury ordered Trump to pay Carroll for his repeated attacks on the author, who accused the former president of rape in her 2019 book, “What Do We Need Men For?”
Trump was found liable for sexual assault, but not rape, last May. He was initially ordered to pay Carroll $5 million, but she sued for a second time after Trump continued publicly harassing her following the judgment.
On Monday, Carroll and her attorney, Roberta Kaplan, appeared on “Good Morning America” to discuss last week’s verdict for the first time.
The former Elle magazine columnist told ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos that the decision left her overwhelmed her with “elation,” adding, “It filled me up — it was almost painful.”
NASA said the discovery shows such "building blocks" of life are "widespread throughout the solar system."
The "Daily Show" host named the two responses that Trump churns out when he's under fire.
The podcaster described the president as a "79-year-old kid" while talking to Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.
A judge dismissed the previous mortgage fraud prosecution encouraged by President Donald Trump.
Adm. Frank “Mitch” Bradley spoke with lawmakers on Thursday about the recent attacks on an alleged drug boat in the Caribbean.
"Wait, what??????" Katie Couric wrote in response to Kirk's opinion.
The GOP senator claims it was “entirely lawful” that the U.S. military launched a follow-up strike to kill survivors of its first strike in the Sept. 2 attack.
The report comes as the defense secretary is engulfed in a controversy over a “double tap” strike on an alleged drug smuggling boat.
The president's holiday-like fantasy is getting roasted by critics.
The case had frustrated authorities for years as they had failed to identify the person responsible for placing the bombs.
Sydney Sweeney entered the Fox News conversation that came to an eye-rolling conclusion.
The lawsuit accuses the Defense Department of violating reporters' First Amendment rights.
“It’s become quite a messy and toxic situation,” a Eurovision expert said.