Ana Navarro Smacks Down Kevin O'Leary's Biden 'History' Ask With A Blunt Look At Trump
HuffPost
The CNN commentator reminded the "Shark Tank" investor about his ties to the president-elect in a tense on-air exchange.
CNN’s Ana Navarro on Wednesday shut down Kevin O’Leary’s questions about how “history” will remember Joe Biden after the president used his farewell address to warn that democracy is at risk.
“How do you think history is going to treat his foreign policy, his Bidenomics, how do you think he’s going to be treated, pardoning his son? The Biden brand name. Do you think a single Biden would get on board of the —,” asked the “Shark Tank” investor, citing the president’s pardon of his son, Hunter Biden.
“I don’t think you can argue against pardoning the son when you voted — when you supported a felon,” said the CNN commentator of O’Leary, who recently met with Donald Trump ― and praised the president-elect’s golf game ― at Mar-a-Lago. “You see, that to me, you lose the moral authority there.”
O’Leary said he planned to meet with Trump to discuss his bid to acquire the U.S. operations of TikTok as a ban of the platform looms. He’s also voiced support for an “economic union” between Canada and the U.S. following Trump’s threats to the neighboring nation.
On CNN, O’Leary continued to press Navarro over how Biden helped his family “brand.”
The president's faux apology exposed what he really wants, said social media users.
NASA said the discovery shows such "building blocks" of life are "widespread throughout the solar system."
The "Daily Show" host named the two responses that Trump churns out when he's under fire.
The podcaster described the president as a "79-year-old kid" while talking to Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.
A judge dismissed the previous mortgage fraud prosecution encouraged by President Donald Trump.
Adm. Frank “Mitch” Bradley spoke with lawmakers on Thursday about the recent attacks on an alleged drug boat in the Caribbean.
"Wait, what??????" Katie Couric wrote in response to Kirk's opinion.
The GOP senator claims it was “entirely lawful” that the U.S. military launched a follow-up strike to kill survivors of its first strike in the Sept. 2 attack.
The report comes as the defense secretary is engulfed in a controversy over a “double tap” strike on an alleged drug smuggling boat.
The president's holiday-like fantasy is getting roasted by critics.
The case had frustrated authorities for years as they had failed to identify the person responsible for placing the bombs.
Sydney Sweeney entered the Fox News conversation that came to an eye-rolling conclusion.
The lawsuit accuses the Defense Department of violating reporters' First Amendment rights.