
Alberta Teachers’ Association might take the government to court. Here’s what we know
CBC
The Alberta Teachers’ Association is weighing its legal options to challenge back-to-work legislation imposed by the provincial government.
“The association will fight this abuse of power with every tool the law provides, and every ounce of conviction we possess,” ATA president Jason Schilling told reporters on Tuesday.
The Back to School Act pre-emptively invokes the notwithstanding clause to stop teachers from striking and prevent courts from overturning the law.
The government has said the use of the clause was justified to prevent localized strikes and ensure school is not interrupted again.
The ATA has been mum on what it plans to do. But CBC spoke to lawyers and civil liberty associations to get a sense of whether the back-to-work order could be challenged in court.
The notwithstanding clause, or Section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, allows governments to pass legislation that violates certain portions of the Charter for up to five years.
Using the clause means the legislation can not be overturned, but Marion Sandilands, a partner at Conway Litigation said how a court can rule alongside the notwithstanding clause remains an open question.
“Even if it can't strike it down because of the notwithstanding clause, the court can declare whether or not it violates Charter rights,” she said.
“So in this case, the court might be asking itself, does this violate the right to collective bargaining, for example?”
There are two high-profile recent cases where the notwithstanding clause has been invoked and challenged in court: In Saskatchewan and Quebec.
In 2023, Premier Scott Moe's Saskatchewan Party government brought in a law preventing children under 16 from changing their names or pronouns at school without parental consent.
And in 2019, the Quebec government used the notwithstanding clause to pass its secularism law.
Both cases saw legal challenges and were appealed by the provincial governments with contrasting results.
In Saskatchewan, the court of appeal said courts can make declarations about constitutionality, even if a law can’t be struck down, but that wasn’t the case in the Court of Appeal of Quebec.













