Pakistan court orders to delete terror charges against Imran Khan in controversial remarks case

Announcing the verdict, the Bench ordered that after removal of charges under Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, that proceedings on the other Sections in the case would continue in the relevant forum.

In a major relief to former Prime Minister Imran Khan, a Pakistani court on September 19 ordered to delete terror charges in a case against him for making controversial remarks against a female judge during a rally in Islamabad last month.

During a rally in Islamabad on August 20, 69-year-old Khan had threatened to file cases against top police officials, Election Commission and political opponents over the treatment meted out to his aide Shahbaz Gill, who was arrested on charges of sedition.

He had also taken exception to Additional District and Sessions Judge Zeba Chaudhry, who had approved Shahbaz Gill’s two-day physical remand at the request of the police and said she should "prepare herself as action would be taken against her." Hours after the speech, Mr. Khan was booked under the Anti-Terrorism Act for threatening police, judiciary and other state institutions at his rally.

He had challenged the case in the Islamabad High Court (IHC) where a two-member Bench headed by Chief Justice Athar Minallah heard the case.

Announcing the verdict, the Bench ordered that after removal of charges under Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, that proceedings on the other Sections in the case would continue in the relevant forum.

Mr. Khan was also charged for violating Section 144 and later on other Sections were added to the FIR, including Section 504 (intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace), 506 (punishment for criminal intimidation), 186 (imprisonment for three months), and 188 (disobedience to an order lawfully promulgated by a public servant) of the Pakistan Penal Code.

After deletion of the man anti-terrorism charges, the case has lost steam. However, Khan is not out of the woods as yet as IHC is also proceeding against him in contempt of court on the basis of the same remarks against the female judge.