Kerala Assembly polls 2026 | There was no young candidate on NCP’s final list to challenge my candidature in Elathur: A.K. Saseendran

A.K. Saseendran defends his candidacy in Elathur, addressing youth representation and farmer protests ahead of the 2026 Kerala Assembly polls.

Why did you decide to contest again in the Assembly election despite protests from a section of leaders in the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) who sought a younger candidate in Elathur?

Those who raised their voice in favour of a younger candidate did not present any widely acceptable alternative. In fact, only seniors’ names were suggested. Moreover, no younger candidates were there on the list submitted to the NCP’s national leadership. As you know, our party has limited opportunities, but a large number of capable individuals. I decided to contest after the party finalised my name for one of the winnable seats, considering multiple factors. The decision was approved by all, although there was some initial confusion.

How do you view the protest by upland farmers who have fielded their own candidate against you in the Elathur Assembly constituency?

It is a rather unusual development that a candidate has been fielded in an urban constituency citing farmers’ concerns. A few individuals, under the guise of representing farmers, are attempting to create anti-Left Democratic Front (LDF) sentiments in upland areas. The LDF government has been at the forefront of addressing major concerns, including issues related to buffer zones around wildlife sanctuaries. The government’s achievements in this sector outweigh the criticism regarding unimplemented projects. Politically motivated groups are trying to misinterpret facts.

Do you believe that the State government has taken sufficient measures to prevent human-wildlife conflict?

Issues arising from climate change must be considered while addressing human-wildlife conflict. We had submitted a ₹620-crore proposal to the Centre aimed at protecting the forest ecosystem and addressing these challenges effectively, but it was not approved. The State government had also proposed amendments to the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, in favour of farmers, but these were rejected.