BJP MLA, Congress MLA and JD(S) MLA among loan defaulters: Karnataka Minister
The Hindu
Cooperation Minister S.T. Somashekhar said that in addition to former Minister Ramesh Jarkiholi, some others, including MLAs Laxmi Hebbalkar and Bandeppa Kashampur, are also among the defaulters of loans from cooperative banks
Cooperation Minister S.T. Somashekhar has said that the list of people who have defaulted on loans from cooperative banks includes MLAs Laxmi Hebbalkar and Bandeppa Kashampur in addition to former Minister Ramesh Jarkiholi.
Speaking to mediapersons in Belagavi on May 10, Mr. Somashekhar said that he had instructed the District Cooperative Banks and Apex Banks to recover the huge loans obtained by politically influential persons.
“It is not just Ramesh Jarkiholi of BJP, Laxmi Hebbalkar of Congress, Bandeppa Kashampur of JD(S) are yet to repay loans. At least 24 persons having sugar mills have availed loans from cooperative banks. Just like seizing houses of people defaulting on loan of ₹2 lakh, steps have been taken against defaulters of big loans by the Apex Bank. Already, notices have been issued to all, and instructions issued to recover them,” he said.
The Minister said some of the defaulters had not paid neither interest nor the principal amount while some are paying only the interest. Loans had been taken from district central cooperative banks in Dakshina Kannada, Tumakuru and other districts.
To a query on whether the bigwigs were being protected, he said, “We will publish details of the pending loans in the public domain.”
Sugar mills in Karnataka had defaulted on loans amounting to ₹6,500 crore. In Belagavi, the district central cooperative bank had disbursed loans amounting to ₹1,200 crore.
On Siddaramaiah’s allegations of corruption, Mr. Somashekhar sought to know whether no scam took place during his tenure as Chief Minister.

Insurance penetration and density are often misunderstood and do not reveal how many families are insured or whether they would be financially secure if the main earning member were to die. The real issue is not reach but adequacy, as households may have life insurance but not enough cover to replace lost income, leaving them financially vulnerable.












