
Alberta MLA compares transgender surgery to livestock castration
CBC
An Alberta legislature member was called on by the Opposition to apologize Thursday after saying the province has a duty to step in to deal with "bad parents" while also comparing transgender surgery to the castration of livestock.
Speaking to reporters, Opposition NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi said United Conservative backbencher Shane Getson should apologize for "comparing human beings to cattle."
Nenshi added, "No parent in this province wants the premier or her four health ministers, and now Shane Getson, sitting in the diagnostic room with them."
Getson made the remark Wednesday in chamber debate over a bill that uses the Charter's notwithstanding clause to protect a trio of transgender laws from court challenge.
One law bans transgender surgery for those under 18 and prohibits drug therapies, such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy, for anyone under 16.
Currently, national policy restricts bottom surgery across Canada to those 18 and over, and such procedures don't take place in Alberta. Puberty blockers are considered reversible and hormone therapy is considered partially reversible.
2SLGBTQ+ advocates have said the Alberta law is an intolerable infringement on the rights of patients, while doctors say it's a dangerous political intervention in what should be clinical decision-making.
Getson said using the notwithstanding clause to override rights in this case is necessary because some parents need intervention to prevent them from making decisions that may not be in the best interests of their children.
He gave the example of castrating a bull to make it a steer, saying once the animal is a steer, there's no going back.
"You're not going to grow back those parts if you change your mind," Getson said on the first full day of debate on the bill.
"If the steer changes his mind, too late; you're a steer."
In a statement Thursday, Getson added that using the notwithstanding clause ensures the laws move forward without delay or uncertainty.
"We cannot allow this legislation to be paused throughout lengthy court proceedings — potentially putting children at risk for years," he said.
"We will use every legal and constitutional tool available to safeguard the health and well-being of children and strengthen the role of parents as a child's primary caregiver."













