Air strikes, not occupation: Where Trump voters draw red lines on Iran
The Straits Times
Several Mr Trump voters said they are standing by the president and his war – at least for now. Read more at straitstimes.com.
NEW YORK - A week into a war with Iran that is already unpopular with much of the American public, US President Donald Trump has offered various explanations for the bombing campaign, estimated the strikes could last weeks, cautioned there will likely be more US casualties, and dismissed concerns about surging oil and gas prices.
While that has troubled many Americans, recent interviews with several who voted for Mr Trump show they are largely standing by the president and his war – at least for now.
Even his most ardent supporters, however, warned that a large deployment of US ground troops in Iran would alarm them.
In the days since the US and Israel attacked Iran, Reuters has spoken to eight Americans who voted for Mr Trump in 2024, part of a group of 20 whom Reuters has interviewed monthly since February, to hear their thoughts on the rapidly escalating conflict.
All eight opposed the idea of the Trump administration sending substantial US ground forces to Iran or getting involved in a protracted effort to install new leadership.
But five said they fully supported the air and sea attacks as the only way to prevent Iran from stockpiling long-range and nuclear missiles.

BRUSSELS, March 17 - A Brussels court on Tuesday ordered a former high-profile Belgian diplomat to stand trial over the assassination of Patrice Lumumba, the first prime minister of Congo, in a final attempt to shed light on the still murky circumstances surrounding his murder. Read more at straitstimes.com.












