Yukon gov't orders 2 cabins on placer claims dismantled
CBC
The Yukon government has ordered that two cabins built upon placer claims near Little Atlin Lake be taken down.
Citizens with the Carcross/Tagish First Nation say the cabins have long flouted the law — antiquated mining laws in desperate need of overhaul.
One of the cabins was two-storeys and complete with a foundation.
A government spokesperson confirmed a complaint was filed after the CBC News published a story about the issue last year.
The cabins were built in the late 1990s, before the territory's mining land-use regulations came into effect and before the Carcross/Tagish First Nation's 2005 final agreement.
Danny Cresswell, the First Nation's field operations manager, doesn't call them cabins. He considers them houses, and on land citizens have held in high esteem forever.
"That's a prime hunting ground, camping ground," he said. "I mean, you couldn't pick up a stone and throw it anywhere without hitting some kind of artifact within a few inches of it. The place is covered with [them]. "Somebody just staked a claim and turned it into a little playground.
"This little thing is a big thing, having this house being gone. I wish my grandparents were still alive and my mum, because they loved that area down there."
John Thompson, a spokesperson with Yukon's department of Energy, Mines and Resources, confirmed there are, in fact, two cabins on claims registered by the same person. Thompson confirmed that save for a foundation, both have been dismantled and removed from the site.
CBC News contacted the claim holder, but he declined comment.
In an interview last March, Jordan Lavigne told CBC News his family, from whom he inherited the claims, followed the rules.
Richard Potvin, with the territory's mines department, said the cabins are "indeed a breach."
"No permanent structures can be built or can't be on-site exceeding a 12-month period, so, in this case, this is primarily what we were dealing with," he said.
Permanent structures include cabins with foundations. Technically, that would be unlawful under a Class 1 notification — a permit for early level mineral exploration — regardless of the minimum amount of work required to keep the claims in good standing. To do that, the claim holder needs to do at least $200 worth of work, each year. Potvin said site visits showed little evidence of mining work, however.
