
‘We enjoy this sometimes’: The rhetorical battle between Justices Alito and Kagan at the Supreme Court
CNN
Alito and Kagan are sharp-tongued strategic questioners and both keenly aware of which other justices might be in play – open to persuasion – during arguments in a case
The morning after Donald Trump was reelected president, Justices Samuel Alito and Elena Kagan began jousting more than usual. They personify the ideological and political gulf on America’s highest court. Alito, a 74-year-old Trenton, New Jersey, native is prepared to tear through decades-old landmarks, while Kagan, a 64-year-old New Yorker and one of three remaining liberals, clings to them. The rhetorical sparring this session highlights a pattern between two forceful justices that is likely to intensify when the Trump administration takes office and bold new policies face lawsuits. On the bench and in opinions, Alito has been markedly irritated in recent years, even as his positions on the law have largely prevailed. His mood has helped fuel speculation over his possible retirement with a new Republican president in office to appoint his successor. Still, 74 is relatively young for a justice to leave the bench. And Alito remains engaged in the courtroom Q-and-A, unlike some justices as they neared retirement, including Anthony Kennedy as he came close to his 2018 departure. More than other justices on their respective sides, conservative Alito and liberal Kagan are sharp-tongued strategic questioners. They are both keenly aware of which other justices might be in play – open to persuasion – during arguments in a case. They come to the courtroom armed and ready to expose the weaknesses of positions voiced at the lectern by opposing lawyers.

White House officials are heaping blame on DC US Attorney Jeanine Pirro over her office’s criminal investigation into Fed Chair Jerome Powell, faulting her for blindsiding them with an inquiry that has forced the administration into a dayslong damage control campaign, four people familiar with the matter told CNN.

The aircraft used in the US military’s first strike on an alleged drug boat in the Caribbean, a strike which has drawn intense scrutiny and resulted in numerous Congressional briefings, was painted as a civilian aircraft and was part of a closely guarded classified program, sources familiar with the program told CNN. Its use “immediately drew scrutiny and real concerns” from lawmakers, one of the sources familiar said, and legislators began asking questions about the aircraft during briefings in September.

DOJ pleads with lawyers to get through ‘grind’ of Epstein files as criticism of redactions continues
“It is a grind,” the head of the Justice Department’s criminal division said in an email. “While we certainly encourage aggressive overachievers, we need reviewers to hit the 1,000-page mark each day.”

A new classified legal opinion produced by the Justice Department argues that President Donald Trump was not limited by domestic law when approving the US operation to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro because of his constitutional authority as commander-in-chief and that he is not constrained by international law when it comes to carrying out law enforcement operations overseas, according to sources who have read the memo.









