The magic of mass appeal in Netflix's Tyson-Paul event owed to shrewd marketing - and willful ignorance

When evaluating the success of last Friday's *ahem* boxing match between Mike Tyson and Jake Paul, we should start by tallying dollars – Paul pocketed a reported $40 million US, while Tyson grossed $20 million.

Most Valuable Promotions – the company staging the event – confirmed by Monday morning that it drew 72,300 spectators to AT&T Stadium, and generated $18.1 million in gate revenue, a record for a boxing match outside Las Vegas. For context, Manny Pacquiao's 2010 showdown with Josh Clottey did $6.4 million in ticket sales at the same venue, while boxing superstar Saul "Canelo" Alvarez did just over $9 million at the gate for his May 2022 win over Billy Joe Saunders.

So yes, measured by the money it made for fighters and promoters, the show, unlike the featured bout, was a knockout.

But we haven't talked enough about what it cost – and not just the $2 million a personal injury law firm coughed up for the "Owner's Experience VIP Package," which included seats at the ring apron and autographed gloves, among other perks.

The event was streamed on Netflix, so it cost you the price of a subscription if you didn't already have one. It's a bargain compared to the pay-per-view rate MVP would have charged if it had partnered with a traditional broadcaster, but it's still something. And if you actually enjoyed watching a 58-year-old man with a long list of health problems stagger to the ring, then lurch around it while a healthy 27-year-old peppered him with punches, maybe Friday's main event cost you, upon sober reflection, some self respect.

The bout cost Tyson another blemish on his once flawless record. He's now 50-7 with two no-contests. 

And Paul?

He entered Friday ranked 106 out of just over 1,500 active heavyweights in the world, according to Boxrec, the online records database. A boxer's ranking typically rises after each win, but five days after beating Tyson over eight dreary rounds, Paul had fallen to 128. To the extent that Paul, a YouTuber turned boxer, has a signature victory, Friday was it, and it cost him 22 spots in Boxrec's rankings. In the eyes of people – and computers – that understand boxing, defeating a legend diminished the winner.

WATCH | Netlfix's Tyson-Paul spectacle dealt with tech issues during live broadcast:

So from here the obvious questions are whether beating up on the husk of Mike Tyson dented Paul's appeal, and whether the formula that made Friday's fight the most viewed boxing match ever is fatally flawed.

The answer to both questions: probably not.

Partly because a large portion of the 108 million people who watched the fight don't know enough about boxing to realize that Paul and Tyson served up a dud. If they knew that much they'd have known better than to harbour expectations for a prize fight involving an unproven pro, and a former champ who hasn't looked dominant since the night Tupac was shot in Las Vegas. If you can con all those people once, you can get many of them again. I'd like to think we're smarter as a species and a society, but every day evidence accrues that we're not.

Viewership numbers dwarfed Floyd Mayweather's best nights – he drew 4.4 million pay-per-view buys against Pacquiao, and 4.3 million when he kayoed Conor McGregor. And even Tyson's biggest pay-per-view rainmaker — his June 1997 rematch against Evander Holyfield – did a shade under 2 million buys.

The key difference between those events and last Friday's, of course, is money. Market-rate pay-per-view prices are a significant barrier to access. Paul-Tyson streamed on Netflix, which is the closest we'll ever get to seeing a major boxing match on network TV.