
Supreme Court's ruling in cheerleader case is inadequate for the digital age
CNN
Nicole Hemmer says the US Supreme Court's latest free-speech ruling in Mahanoy Area School Dist. v. B. L. -- involving a cheerleader, Snapchat and a string of four-letter words -- reinforces the historical murkiness of minors' political rights and was far too narrow to be adequate for students in a digital age.
Denied a spot on the varsity cheer squad in early 2017, 14-year-old Brandi Levy took to Snapchat to vent her frustration. "F**k school f**k softball f**k cheer f**k everything," she wrote on a photo she posted to Snapchat, a message and photo-sharing app where posts vanish 24 hours after they appear. Though she sent her post privately to her followers, someone snapped a photo of it and shared it with the squad and coaches. As a result, Levy received a one-year suspension from cheer.More Related News

One year ago this week, Joe Biden was president. I was in Doha, Qatar, negotiating with Israel and Hamas to finalize a ceasefire and hostage release deal. The incoming Trump team worked closely with us, a rare display of nonpartisanship to free hostages and end a war. It feels like a decade ago. A lot can happen in a year, as 2025 has shown.












