Supreme Court irked over bulky filings by Amazon, Future
The Hindu
It seeks common small compilation
Irked over “truckload” of bulky documents filed by parties in a batch of petitions arising out of the Amazon-Future Retail case, the Supreme Court Tuesday asked whether the purpose was just to drag on or “harass the judges” and sought a common small compilation of documents.
A bench comprising Chief Justice N.V. Ramana and Justices A.S. Bopanna and Hima Kohli asked the counsel for parties to file small volume of documents so that the matter can be disposed of, and fixed the case for hearing on December 8.
“I am sorry to say to all of you. What is the fun in filing 22-23 volumes of records? How many documents both sides have filed repeatedly and is it the purpose of just dragging on or otherwise to harass the judges,” said the CJI. “It is completely unnecessary,” senior advocate Harish Salve, appearing for the Future group, said, and suggested both sides could file a common document.

Insurance penetration and density are often misunderstood and do not reveal how many families are insured or whether they would be financially secure if the main earning member were to die. The real issue is not reach but adequacy, as households may have life insurance but not enough cover to replace lost income, leaving them financially vulnerable.












