Supreme Court Fast-Tracks TikTok Case in Face of Jan. 19 Deadline
The New York Times
The company and its Chinese parent invoked the First Amendment in urging the justices to step in before a deadline to sell or be shut down.
The Supreme Court agreed on Wednesday to hear TikTok’s challenge to a law that could ban its U.S. operations, putting the case on an exceptionally fast track that will culminate in oral arguments next month.
In setting aside two hours for the argument on Jan. 10, the justices signaled that they viewed the questions in the case as extraordinarily critical, pitting the Constitution’s protection of free expression against the government’s assertions of threats to national security.
The court’s move came only two days after TikTok and ByteDance, its Chinese parent company, filed an emergency application asking the justices to temporarily block the law. In another break with its usual practices, the court did not ask the government to respond to the application, instead treating it as a petition seeking review and granting it.
The law, which passed with wide bipartisan support, calls for ByteDance to sell it to a non-Chinese company or otherwise face a ban in the United States. TikTok has said the law violates the First Amendment. But the Biden administration and lawmakers have countered that given its Chinese ownership, TikTok raised national security concerns because of the breadth of user data available and the risk that the Chinese government could use the app to spread covert disinformation.
The court did not block the law while the case moves forward, which suggested that it may issue a ruling before the Jan. 19 deadline set by the law. That would mean the case would be resolved before President-elect Donald J. Trump is inaugurated on Jan. 20.
The law allows the president to extend the deadline for 90 days in limited circumstances. Mr. Trump has sent mixed messages about his support for the app, including by meeting this week with executives of TikTok at his Florida residence, Mar-a-Lago.
New A.I. bots can do more than just chat. They can edit files, send emails, book trips and cause trouble.
The series, “inspired” by the story of a royal dresser later convicted of murder, is getting added attention over the former Duchess of York’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
Lawyers for both sides in the federal lawsuit, brought by six medical organizations, are trying to understand the ramifications of the judge’s decision.
Andy Weir discusses his science-fueled novel “Project Hail Mary,” which has been adapted into a film that opens in theaters on Friday.
After years of criticism and financial risk, Palantir, Anthropic and small start-ups are generating rewards from their investments in defense tech.
In a legal filing, the government said it questioned whether the A.I. start-up could be a “trusted partner” in wartime, which led it to label the company a supply chain risk.
Before humanity sent satellites, telescopes, humans and weapons into space, Robert Goddard experimented with the first liquid-fueled rocket on his aunt’s farm.
A draft State Department memo outlines ways the Trump administration may ratchet up pressure on the African country by ending health support “on a massive scale.”
A Florida bill that would have regulated artificial intelligence, backed by Gov. Ron DeSantis, failed to gain traction after President Trump made it clear he did not want states to rein in the technology.
The series, “inspired” by the story of a royal dresser later convicted of murder, is getting added attention over the former Duchess of York’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
After postponing launch opportunities in February and March, the agency determined that four astronauts could proceed toward the first crewed lunar journey in more than 50 years.
The technology has been used to create misleading fakes before. But never at this scale.
The number doctors use to demarcate hypertension keeps going down, a trend applauded by many experts, who point to studies linking high blood pressure and dementia.