
Supreme Court declines to revisit landmark First Amendment decision, leaving higher bar for libel in place
CNN
The Supreme Court declined to revisit the landmark First Amendment decision in New York Times v. Sullivan. The 1964 ruling created a higher bar for public figures to claim libel and has been a bedrock of US media law.
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the court's refusal to take up the case.
"I would grant certiorari in this case to revisit the 'actual malice' standard," Thomas wrote. "This case is one of many showing how New York Times and its progeny have allowed media organizations and interest groups 'to cast false aspersions on public figures with near impunity.'"

Janet Mills and her allies are counting on a gender gap to narrow Platner’s wide lead ahead of the June 9 primary to decide who will face incumbent Republican Sen. Susan Collins. They are betting that the unfiltered style that has brought Platner widespread attention as someone who could help Democrats reach young men will backfire with women.












