Supreme Court agrees to examine fresh plea challenging sedition law
The Hindu
The petition said there is need to take into account the “march of the times and the development of the law” before dealing with Section 124-A
The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to examine a fresh plea by a former Army officer challenging the constitutional validity of the sedition law on the ground that it causes “chilling effect” on speech and is an unreasonable restriction on free expression, a fundamental right. A Bench comprising Chief Justice N.V. Ramana, A.S. Bopanna and Hrishikesh Roy directed the petitioner to serve a copy of the plea to the Attorney General K.K. Venugopal. The plea, filed by Major-General S.G. Vombatkere (Retd.) submitted that Section 124-A of the Indian Penal Code, which deals with the offence of sedition, is wholly unconstitutional and should be “unequivocally and unambiguously struck down”.More Related News

Karnataka HC refuses to grant bail to former MUDA commissioner Dinesh Kumar in money laundering case
Karnataka HC denies bail to former MUDA commissioner Dinesh Kumar in money laundering case, allowing re-application after three months.

The “Women in Math” touring exhibition that started with a show in Berlin in 2016 stems from the observation that even today, “women find it difficult to embrace a career in the mathematical academic world and the disparity between the proportion of men and that of women among professional mathematicians is still shamefully large.”











