Suo motu revision petitions against Ministers | Judge wants to know whether HC followed procedure before numbering them
The Hindu
Madras High Court questions procedures followed for numbering six suo motu criminal revision petitions against four sitting and two former Ministers in TN. Justice G. Jayachandran seeks instructions from Registrar General on whether the petitions were placed before a three-member committee. He also recalls a similar suo motu writ petition taken up in Madurai Bench in 2022. Revision petitions against Rural Development Minister I. Periyasamy, Higher Education Minister K. Ponmudy, Revenue Minister K.K.S.S.R. Ramachandran, Finance Minister Thangam Thennarasu, former CM O. Panneerselvam and former Social Welfare Minister B. Valarmathi. Madras HC seeks answers on procedures followed before numbering petitions, to be heard on merits Jan 8.
The six suo motu criminal revision petitions taken up by the Madras High Court against the acquittal/discharge of four sitting as well as two former Ministers in Tamil Nadu from different criminal cases took a significant turn on Tuesday, with the portfolio judge wanting to know whether procedures were followed scrupulously before numbering them.
Justice G. Jayachandran directed advocate M. Santhanaraman, representing the High Court’s Registrar General, to obtain instructions as to whether Justice N. Anand Venkatesh’s decision to take suo motu cognisance was run by a three-member committee of the High Court, constituted in 2019, to consider suo motu litigations.
Justice Jayachandran pointed out that another single judge of the High Court had taken up a similar suo motu writ petition during the latter’s tenure in the Madurai Bench in 2022. It was taken up on the basis of a letter received by him complaining about corruption by a Registration department employee at Pattukottai.
The Registry of the Madurai Bench numbered the suo motu writ petition without the approval of the Chief Justice and without informing the administrative judge in the Bench. The petition was also listed for hearing before the same judge who had taken suo motu cognisance and he issued certain directions too.
Subsequently, when it got listed before a Division Bench of Justices Paresh Upadhyay (since retired) and R. Vijayakumar on April 5, 2022, they wrote that all public interest litigation petitions as well as writ petitions filed by and against the High Court must be listed only before a Division Bench as per the roster.
The Bench also recalled that the administrative committee (comprising the Chief Justice and six senior judges) of the High Court had on October 24, 2019 resolved to constitute a committee comprising three judges to consider whether letters received by individual judges of the court could be taken up as suo motu PIL petitions.
Therefore, Justice Jayachandran wanted to know from the Registrar General whether the six suo motu criminal revision petitions too were numbered only after being placed before the three member committee and whether such procedure was confined only to PIL petitions and not criminal revision petitions.
As Telugu Desam Party (TDP) chief N. Chandrababu Naidu is all set to take oath as the Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh for the fourth time, at Kesarapalle IT Park located near Vijayawada on June 12 (Wednesday), arrangements are underway for a live telecast of the ceremony at eleven places across the Nellore district.
Governor S. Abdul Nazeer has invited the Telugu Desam Party (TDP), which is part of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), to form the government in the State. The swearing-in ceremony will be held at Kesarapalle near here on June 12 (Wednesday). Prime Minister Narendra Modi and a host of national leaders will take part in the event
Ambassador of Finland to India Kimmo Lähdevirta on Tuesday said Finnish companies “face issues” in Tamil Nadu due to regulations that prevent their participation in tendering processes. Interacting with senior journalists of The Hindu at its head office in Chennai, he said certain regulations imposed by the State government were limiting.