Sen. Bob Menendez declines to say whether he’ll resign should forthcoming trial result in conviction
CNN
Sen. Bob Menendez declined to say whether he’ll resign should his forthcoming federal corruption trial result in a conviction.
Sen. Bob Menendez declined to say whether he’ll resign should his forthcoming federal corruption trial result in a conviction. The New Jersey Democrat told CNN’s Manu Raju on Capitol Hill last week, “I am looking forward to proving my innocence,” when asked repeatedly whether he would resign in the face of a potential conviction. Menendez’s trial is expected to begin with jury selection on Monday. He is facing bribery charges for allegedly taking steps to benefit the governments of Egypt and Qatar and help several New Jersey businessmen while receiving in exchange gold bars, cash, a luxury car and Formula One Grand Prix race tickets. He has forcefully denied the charges against him and has said that he will prove his innocence while claiming that he is being persecuted by prosecutors. Menendez will face a jury alongside two New Jersey businessmen who are co-defendants. His wife, Nadine, also has been charged but will be tried separately. The trial is scheduled to last several weeks, as prosecutors try to prove that Menendez and the businessmen, Wael Hana and Fred Daibes, engaged in a wide-ranging corruption scheme to help the Egyptian and Qatari governments in exchange for lucrative bribes.
Crews in Atlanta completed repairs Wednesday morning to a key water main whose break, among others, contributed to a huge swath of the city spending days without safe drinking water – though a boil advisory remains in effect for many homes and businesses “out of an abundance of caution,” the city said.
Two families have filed a federal lawsuit against Tennessee Governor Bill Lee and the Williamson County School District, claiming their middle school kids were arrested, strip-searched, placed in solitary confinement, forced to undergo evaluations and placed on house arrest after officials misinterpreted a Tennessee statute and claimed that conversations between peers were “threats of mass violence.”