‘Run Rabbit Run’ movie review: Sarah Snook does too much for a movie that does too little for her
The Hindu
The Australian film does a neat job in creating an atmospheric horror but loses its command over the genre after a point
Australian filmmaker Diana Reid must either be a fan of Stephen King or The Shining, or both. Her latest feature, Run Rabbit Run, has the literary attributes of Stephen King as well as the genre characteristics of The Shining. Or at least, Run Rabbit Run does remind you of Stanley Kubrick’s masterpiece, particularly the way Reid playfully exploits the motif of the twin sisters from The Shining. Though Run Rabbit Run has nothing to do with twins, it has a subplot that involves two child actors who play two different characters; at one point, it takes a moment to recognise who plays what. For, the child actors look like mirror images. Reid gets the casting right, and Run Rabbit Run benefits largely from its actors.
All of which is not to say that Run Rabbit Run is a great work by any stretch. The screenplay comes across like the work of a horror movie fan who has seen all the great works of classical horror and yet, lacks clarity. Reid seems to have clarity only in the genre elements and a premise that benefits by stacking the odds against its protagonist. There is no emotional depth nor do the characters feel real.
Run Rabbit Run starts pretty well: Sarah (Sarah Snook), a fertility doctor, lives with her daughter Mia (Lily Latorre) who has just turned seven. Sarah recently lost her father with whom she was closest, and comes to know that her estranged husband Pete and his partner are trying for a baby. “Mia was going to be the only kid. I thought we agreed on it,” she shoots back at her ex-husband. Around this time, Sarah comes home to find an unusual gift for Mia at the doorstep — a rabbit with blood-red eyes waiting for them. At the same time, Mia begins to behave strangely and becomes increasingly not herself by the day.
There is a lot that goes against Sarah and understandably so. The unwritten rule in psychological horror is that the protagonist has to feel a sense of suffocation from her immediate reality. So, let’s dump everything in it.
When the genre elements kick in, the first half of Run Rabbit Run is quite enjoyable, giving us a false promise that there is something profound to come in the latter half. Sadly, it doesn’t come together as a whole. Even when the movie tries to create a mood, something doesn’t work or is wrong about the way Reid imagines horror and suspense.
The winds are always rough in Run Rabbit Run; its aural cues almost never complement the visuals. So much so that when you watch the movie on mute, the audio description does a better job of telling us what kind of horror Reid is aiming at. The audio description always goes: ominous score, ominous music, unsettling score, disorienting sounds. Mia wears a paper mask shaped like a rabbit. These are all derivative, there is hardly any original. As the movie progresses, we are definitely hooked on; that is one thing Run Rabbit Run can be proud of. But over time, the narrative gets tedious and repetitive as if we are stuck in a time loop.
Written by Hannah Kent, Run Rabbit Run drops hints about Sarah, the equation she had with her father and the estranged relationship with her mother. We learn all this through Mia. There is a weighty piece of reveal about Sarah that is not difficult to guess, but one that the movie reserves till the end. The issue with Kent’s script is the narrative gaps and the lack of emotional clarity: when Mia exhibits strange behaviour at a later point — when she goes by a different name — it becomes a movie about two sisters when it would have actually made a decent watch if it were about Sarah and Mia. It still is. But Run Rabbit Run ultimately becomes Sarah’s story with a tad simple solutions.

A vacuum cleaner haunted by a ghost is the kind of one-liner which can draw in a festival audience looking for a little light-hearted fun to fill the time slots available between the “heavier” films which require much closer attention. A useful ghost, the debut feature of Thai filmmaker Ratchapoom Boonbunchachoke being screened in the world cinema category at the 30th International Film Festival of Kerala (IFFK), even appears so in the initial hour. Until, the film becomes something more, with strong undercurrents of Thailand’s contemporary political history.

Sustainability is not an add-on, but stamped firmly into the process: every piece is biodegradable, waste-free and unembellished, free from glitter or beads. “Products should be sustainable and biodegradable so that our planet is not harmed,” says Anu Elizabeth Alexander, a student of Sishya, Adyar. At a recent exhibition, the stars she made sold the fastest, followed by the small diamonds. “I would like people to know about the process, how it is created, and that it is sustainable,” says Anu. Infanta Leon from Kotturpuram developed an interest in crochet as a teenager. It was a hobbyhorse that evolved into a steed that would help her embark on a journey of identity-shaping creative engagement. She started making Christmas-themed decor two years ago, spurred by a desire to craft safe, eco-friendly toys for children. “With a toddler at home, and my elder child sensitive to synthetic materials, I wanted to create items that were gentle, durable and tactile,” she explains. Her earliest creations were small amigurumi toys which gradually evolved into ornaments that could adorn Christmas trees with warmth and charm.











