
Nirmala Sitharaman says budget to address growth, inflation concerns
The Hindu
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman identified high energy prices among the biggest problems facing the Indian economy in the near future
Faced with twin challenges of slowing growth rate and high inflation, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on October 12 said her budget for the next financial year will be ‘very carefully structured’ to help the economy sustain growth momentum and rein in prices.
She identified high energy prices among the biggest problems facing the Indian economy in the near future.
“Specifics [of the next budget] may be difficult at this stage because it’s a bit too early. But broadly, the growth priorities will be kept absolutely on the top. Even as I speak about the concerns that inflation brings before me. So, inflation concerns will have to be addressed. But then how would you manage growth would be the natural question,” Ms. Sitharaman said.
Visiting Washington DC to attend the annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank, the Finance Minister was responding to a question on the next year’s budget at a fire-side chat with eminent economist Eshwar Prasad at the prestigious Brookings Institute.
She is scheduled to present the annual budget for the fiscal starting April 2023 on February 1.
Almost all institutional and private forecasters have cut their projections for India’s GDP growth in the current 2022-23 fiscal on tighter monetary policy denting demand and the economy facing headwinds from a global slowdown.
“But that’s the point of being sure how you’re going to be able to balance the two and be sure that the momentum that the Indian economy has got coming out of the pandemic and the momentum with which it will grow even the next year, even as per the many many multilateral institutions which are observing India cannot be weakened,” she said.

Insurance penetration and density are often misunderstood and do not reveal how many families are insured or whether they would be financially secure if the main earning member were to die. The real issue is not reach but adequacy, as households may have life insurance but not enough cover to replace lost income, leaving them financially vulnerable.












