News organizations petition Nevada Supreme Court to open up secret Murdoch succession case

A group of news organizations filed an emergency petition Thursday, asking Nevada’s highest court to unseal the ongoing family succession battle playing out in a Reno courtroom that will determine the future of Rupert Murdoch’s vast media empire.

A group of news organizations filed an emergency petition Thursday, asking Nevada’s highest court to unseal the ongoing family succession battle playing out in a Reno courtroom that will determine the future of Rupert Murdoch’s vast media empire. Murdoch is seeking to amend the family trust that he established decades ago, giving his four oldest children equal votes over the future of his conservative media empire after he dies. The 93-year-old patriarch wants to change the structure so that his eldest son and chosen successor Lachlan – who is more politically aligned with his father than the other children – will remain in charge for decades to come. But his three other eldest children are fighting the change. The family battle is taking place behind closed doors in a Washoe County courtroom. Nevada offers one of the most private court settings for issues like family trust decisions, allowing parties and judges to lock the cases behind closed doors to such an extreme degree that their very existence is not even publicized on court dockets. The Murdoch case was only revealed after The New York Times published a report revealing its existence in July. Last week, a coalition of six news organizations including CNN, The New York Times and Washington Post, petitioned the Washoe County court for access, arguing that the secrecy violated a constitutional right to access and that the fate of thousands of jobs, as well as a major influence on American politics, would be decided in this case. But the district court denied the request, and the evidentiary hearings, with Rupert and his eldest four children in attendance, proceeded this week behind closed doors. The petition filed by the media coalition on Thursday asked the Nevada Supreme Court to allow press access to the case and its documents. The coalition argued that sealing the case “violated the weighty First Amendment presumption of access to civil proceedings,” and that “Nevada law does not permit the blanket sealing ordered here.”